To investigate roles of the discriminator and open complex (OC) lifetime in transcription initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP; α 2 ββ'ωσ 70 ), we compare productive and abortive initiation rates, short RNA distributions, and OC lifetime for the λP R and T7A1 promoters and variants with exchanged discriminators, all with the same transcribed region. The discriminator determines the OC lifetime of these promoters. Permanganate reactivity of thymines reveals that strand backbones in open regions of longlived λP R -discriminator OCs are much more tightly held than for shorter-lived T7A1-discriminator OCs. Initiation from these OCs exhibits two kinetic phases and at least two subpopulations of ternary complexes. Long RNA synthesis (constrained to be single round) occurs only in the initial phase (<10 s), at similar rates for all promoters. Less than half of OCs synthesize a full-length RNA; the majority stall after synthesizing a short RNA. Most abortive cycling occurs in the slower phase (>10 s), when stalled complexes release their short RNA and make another without escaping. In both kinetic phases, significant amounts of 8-nt and 10-nt transcripts are produced by longer-lived, λP R -discriminator OCs, whereas no RNA longer than 7 nt is produced by shorter-lived T7A1-discriminator OCs. These observations and the lack of abortive RNA in initiation from short-lived ribosomal promoter OCs are well described by a quantitative model in which ∼1.0 kcal/mol of scrunching free energy is generated per translocation step of RNA synthesis to overcome OC stability and drive escape. The different length-distributions of abortive RNAs released from OCs with different lifetimes likely play regulatory roles.RNA polymerase | open complex lifetime | transcription initiation | abortive RNA | hybrid length M any facets of transcription initiation by E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP; α 2 ββ′ωσ 70 ) have been elucidated, but significant questions remain about the mechanism or mechanisms by which initial transcribing complexes (ITC) with a short RNA-DNA hybrid decide to advance and escape from the promoter to enter elongation mode, or, alternately, to stall, release their short RNA, and reinitiate (abortive cycling). For RNAP to escape, its sequencespecific interactions with promoter DNA in the binary open complex (OC) must be overcome.The open regions of promoter DNA in the binary OC are the −10 region (six residues, with specific interactions between σ 2.2 and the nontemplate strand), the discriminator region (typically six to eight residues with no consensus sequence, the upstream end of which interacts with σ 1.2 ), and the transcription start site (TSS, +1) and adjacent residue (+2), which are in the active site of RNAP (Table 1). The interactions involving and directed by the six-residue λP R discriminator make its OC longlived and highly stable (1). A six-residue discriminator allows the OC to form without deforming (prescrunching) either open discriminator strand (2). Less extensive interactions involving and directed...
Initial recognition of promoter DNA by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is proposed to trigger a series of conformational changes beginning with bending and wrapping of the 40–50 bp of DNA immediately upstream of the −35 region. Kinetic studies demonstrated that the presence of upstream DNA facilitates bending and entry of the downstream duplex (to +20) into the active site cleft to form an advanced closed complex (CC), prior to melting of ~13 bp (−11 to +2), including the transcription start site (+1). Atomic force microscopy and footprinting revealed that the stable open complex (OC) is also highly wrapped (−60 to +20). To test the proposed bent-wrapped model of duplex DNA in an advanced RNAP–λPR CC and compare wrapping in the CC and OC, we use fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between cyanine dyes at far-upstream (−100) and downstream (+14) positions of promoter DNA. Similarly large intrinsic FRET efficiencies are observed for the CC (0.30 ± 0.07) and the OC (0.32 ± 0.11) for both probe orientations. Fluorescence enhancements at +14 are observed in the single-dye-labeled CC and OC. These results demonstrate that upstream DNA is extensively wrapped and the start site region is bent into the cleft in the advanced CC, reducing the distance between positions −100 and +14 on promoter DNA from >300 to <100 Å. The proximity of upstream DNA to the downstream cleft in the advanced CC is consistent with the proposed mechanism for facilitation of OC formation by upstream DNA.
FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) between far-upstream (−100) and downstream (+14) cyanine dyes (Cy3, Cy5) showed extensive bending and wrapping of λPR promoter DNA on Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) in closed and open complexes (CC and OC, respectively). Here we determine the kinetics and mechanism of DNA bending and wrapping by FRET and of formation of RNAP contacts with −100 and +14 DNA by single-dye protein-induced fluorescence enhancement (PIFE). FRET and PIFE kinetics exhibit two phases: rapidly reversible steps forming a CC ensemble ({CC}) of four intermediates [initial (RPC), early (I1E), mid (I1M), and late (I1L)], followed by conversion of {CC} to OC via I1L. FRET and PIFE are first observed for I1E, not RPc. FRET and PIFE together reveal large-scale bending and wrapping of upstream and downstream DNA as RPC advances to I1E, decreasing the Cy3−Cy5 distance to ∼75 Å and making RNAP–DNA contacts at −100 and +14. We propose that far-upstream DNA wraps on the upper β′-clamp while downstream DNA contacts the top of the β-pincer in I1E. Converting I1E to I1M (∼1 s time scale) reduces FRET efficiency with little change in −100 or +14 PIFE, interpreted as clamp opening that moves far-upstream DNA (on β′) away from downstream DNA (on β) to increase the Cy3−Cy5 distance by ∼14 Å. FRET increases greatly in converting I1M to I1L, indicating bending of downstream duplex DNA into the clamp and clamp closing to reduce the Cy3−Cy5 distance by ∼21 Å. In the subsequent rate-determining DNA-opening step, in which the clamp may also open, I1L is converted to the initial unstable OC (I2). Implications for facilitation of CC-to-OC isomerization by upstream DNA and upstream binding, DNA-bending transcription activators are discussed.
FRET (fluorescence energy transfer) between farupstream (-100) and downstream (+14) cyanine dyes showed extensive bending/wrapping of λPR promoter DNA on E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) in closed and open complexes (CC, OC).Here we determine the kinetics and mechanism of DNA bending/wrapping by FRET and of formation of RNAP contacts with -100 and +14 DNA by single-dye fluorescence enhancements (PIFE). FRET/PIFE kinetics exhibit two phases: rapidly-reversible steps forming a CC ensemble ({CC}c of four intermediates (initial (RPC), early (I1E), mid-(I1M), late (I1L)), followed by conversion of {CC} to OC via I1L. FRET and PIFE are first observed for I1E, not RPc. FRET/PIFE together reveal large-scale bending/wrapping of upstream and downstream DNA as RPC advances to I1E, reducing -100/+14 distance to ~75Å and making RNAP-DNA contacts at -100 and +14. We propose that far-upstream DNA wraps on the upper b'-clamp while downstream DNA contacts the top of the b-pincer in I1E. Converting I1E to I1M (~1s time-scale) reduces FRET efficiency with little change in -100/+14PIFE, interpreted as clampopening that moves far-upstream DNA (on b') away from downstream DNA (on b) to increase the -100/+14 distance by ~14Å. FRET increases greatly in converting I1M to I1L, indicating bending of downstream duplex DNA into the clamp and clamp-closing to reduce the -100/+14 distance by ~21Å. In the subsequent rate-determining DNA-opening step, in which the clamp may also open, I1L converts to the initial unstable OC (I2). Implications for facilitation of CC-to-OC isomerization by upstream DNA and upstream-binding, DNA-bending transcription activators are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.