Background and ObjectivesGlucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of insulin secretion, and their functional loss is an early characteristic of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Pharmacological levels of GLP-1, but not GIP, can overcome this loss. GLP-1 and GIP exert their insulinotropic effects through their respective receptors expressed on pancreatic β-cells. Both the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and the GIP receptor (GIPR) are members of the secretin family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and couple positively to adenylate cyclase. We compared the signalling properties of these two receptors to gain further insight into why GLP-1, but not GIP, remains insulinotropic in T2DM patients.MethodsGLP-1R and GIPR were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells, and basal and ligand-induced cAMP production were investigated using a cAMP-responsive luciferase reporter gene assay. Arrestin3 (Arr3) recruitment to the two receptors was investigated using enzyme fragment complementation, confocal microscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET).ResultsGIPR displayed significantly higher (P<0.05) ligand-independent activity than GLP-1R. Arr3 displayed a robust translocation to agonist-stimulated GLP-1R but not to GIPR. These observations were confirmed in FRET experiments, in which GLP-1 stimulated the recruitment of both GPCR kinase 2 (GRK2) and Arr3 to GLP-1R. These interactions were not reversed upon agonist washout. In contrast, GIP did not stimulate recruitment of either GRK2 or Arr3 to its receptor. Interestingly, arrestin remained at the plasma membrane even after prolonged (30 min) stimulation with GLP-1. Although the GLP-1R/arrestin interaction could not be reversed by agonist washout, GLP-1R and arrestin did not co-internalise, suggesting that GLP-1R is a class A receptor with regard to arrestin binding.ConclusionsGIPR displays higher basal activity than GLP-1R but does not effectively recruit GRK2 or Arr3.

Drugs targeting dopamine receptors have been the focus of much research over the past 30 years, in large part because of their role in treating multiple pathological conditions including Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome, and hyperprolactinemia. Missense mutations in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can alter basal and/or ligand-induced signaling, which in turn can affect individuals' susceptibility to disease and/or response to therapeutics. To date, five coding variants in the human D1 receptor (hD1R; T37P, T37R, R50S, S199A, and A229T) and three in the human D2 receptor (hD2R; P310S, S311C, and T351A) have been reported in the NCBI single nucleotide polymorphism database. We utilized site-directed mutagenesis to generate cDNAs encoding these receptor isoforms. After expression in either HEK293 or neuronal GT1 cells, basal and ligand-induced signaling of each of these receptors was determined and compared to wild type. In addition, we investigated expression levels of each recombinant receptor and the effect of inverse agonist administration. Our data demonstrate that naturally occurring amino acid substitutions in the hD1R can lead to alterations in expression levels as well as in basal and ligand-induced signaling. The potency and efficacy of dopamine, synthetic agonists (i.e., fenoldopam, SKF-38393, SKF-82958, and SCH23390), and inverse agonists [i.e., flupenthixol and (+)butaclamol] were reduced at selected hD1R variants. Furthermore, inverse agonist induced effects on expression levels were sensitive to selected amino acid substitutions. In contrast to the hD1R variants, hD2R polymorphisms did not affect ligand function or receptor expression. The observation that the hD1R mutations induce significant alterations in pharmacologic properties may have implications both for disease susceptibility and/or therapeutic response to dopaminergic ligands.

No abstract

The human dopamine 2 receptor (hD2R) modulates locomotor activity, hormone secretion, and neuropsychiatric function. Current knowledge of the hD2R structure is in large part derived from mutagenesis studies and molecular pharmacologic analysis together with homology modeling using bovine rhodopsin as a template. In this study, we utilized comparison of the Drosophila D2-like receptor (DD2R) with the hD2R as a novel approach for identifying candidate amino acids that are determinants of ligand potency and/or efficacy. We focused our studies on four dopaminergic ligands that are used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: bromocriptine, pergolide, piribedil, and ropinirole. All four ligands are potent agonists at the wild-type hD2R, whereas only bromocriptine shows comparable function at the DD2R. We performed site-directed mutagenesis to replace hD2R amino acids (modeled to project into the ligand binding pocket) with corresponding fly residues, and vice versa. Substitution of three amino acids in the hD2R with the homologous DD2R residues (V91A, C118S, and L170I) led to a pronounced loss of pergolide potency and efficacy. A converse triple amino acid substitution of human residues into the fly receptor (DD2R-A133V/S160C/I211L) markedly enhanced pergolide efficacy and potency at the mutant DD2R. The same substitutions also converted piribedil and ropinirole, which lacked appreciable activity on the DD2R, to partial agonists. These findings show the important role of these three residues in drug-receptor interactions. Our study illustrates that comparison of a mammalian receptor with an invertebrate homolog complements previously described strategies for defining G protein-coupled receptor structure-function relationships.