Background: Although spinal anesthesia can be applied in different patient positions, the most frequently used positions are sitting and lateral positions. It is known that different patient positions during spinal anesthesia have effects on hemodynamic parameters, postdural puncture headache, and intraocular pressure. Aim: The study aimed to determine the effect of spinal anesthesia performed in either sitting or right lateral position on postspinal headache and intraocular pressure during elective cesarean section. Patients and Methods: The study was a randomized controlled study of 104 eligible pregnant women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section. The women were randomized into two groups. Spinal anesthesia was performed either in the sitting (Group S, n = 53) or the right lateral position (Group L, n = 51). Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded throughout the operation. The participants were informed and monitored for postspinal headaches. Intraocular pressure before and after the operation was measured with Icare PRO. The obtained data were statistically compared between the two groups. Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic data. Postdural puncture headache was observed in five patients in Group S and one patient in Group L (P =0.04). There was no difference between the groups in terms of intraocular pressure (P >.05). Heart rate was not significantly different between the groups; however, there was a significant difference in average blood pressure in 1, 5, 30, and 40 minutes (P <.05). The number of trials administered to patients for spinal anesthesia was significantly higher in Group L (P =0.01). Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia performed in the sitting position for cesarean section caused a higher postspinal headache than in the right lateral position, but the position did not affect intraocular pressure.

Background Brachial plexus block is one of the peripheral nerve blocks commonly used in regional anesthesia. We aimed to investigate whether the perfusion index (PI) measurement can be used to evaluate the adequacy of the upper limb blocks accompanied by ultrasonography. Thirty-three patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who were in the ASA I–II group who will have a hand, forearm, and arm operation were included in the study. An appropriate type of brachial plexus block was applied to these patients under the guidance of ultrasonography. After the block application was completed, the sensory and motor blocks were evaluated at the 5th, 10th, and 20th min. In addition, perfusion indices measured from both extremities of the patient were recorded at the 5th, 10th, and 20th min. Results In 32 of 33 patients who underwent brachial plexus block, our block was successful, and perfusion index measurements in the applied limb increased continuously from the 5th min over the 20-min observation period. In one patient who failed the block and in the arm group without block, no statistically significant difference was detected in the 5th, 10th, and 20th min perfusion index measurements. Conclusions Perfusion index measurement is a very valuable and usable method to evaluate the success of peripheral nerve blocks early, easily, and objectively.