The distillery spent wash (DSW) from bioethanol industries has a very high chemical oxygen demand (COD). Hence, the goal of this study is to investigate the effect of currents (2.5, 3 and 3.5 A) and initial pHs (4.4, 5.0 and 7.0) on electrocoagulation (EC) to decrease the COD in DSW. The results showed that the EC at the current of 3.5 A enabled a higher COD removal efficiency (74.9%) than those at the currents of 2.5 (35.4%) and 3 A (60.9%). Furthermore, the initial pH of 7.0 resulted in a higher COD removal efficiency than the initial pHs of 4.4 and 5.0. The solution pH and temperature increased throughout the process. The working volume was not constant due to the reactions of water reduction, evaporation and flotation. Scum and sludge productions were also monitored during the process. Then, the measured data (COD, sludge and scum) were used in the modeling. The simple mechanistic models were successfully built and applied to simulate the data in mass units with two different routes of process. Route 1 assumed that the COD was converted to sludge and then the latter was converted to scum. Route 2 assumed that the COD was converted to the sludge and scum at the same time. When the EC was operated at the initial pH of 4.4, the COD removal process followed route 1, but that at the initial pHs of 5.0 and 7.0, the COD removal process followed route 2. The higher the current applied in the EC, the higher the kinetic constants of ka and kb. Additionally, the higher the initial pH set, the higher the kinetic constants were. This showed that the formation rates of sludge and scum at the higher currents or initial pHs were faster than those at the lower values.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.