Introduction: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is becoming a more frequent treatment option for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) as outcomes measures are improving. However, there is concern that malalignment of TAA can result in premature failure of the implant. One of the malalignment issues is the talar sagittal malposition. However, a consensus on the significance of the sagittal translation of the talus in TAA is yet to be established. The aim of this study was, therefore, to clarify whether talus OA subluxation is normalized after the implantation of a mobile TAA. Methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients with symptomatic end-stage ankle OA underwent 50 cementless three-component mobile-bearing VANTAGE TAA with 21 right ankles (42%) and 29 left ankles (58%). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed: Clinical variables: American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score (0–100), visual analogue scale (VAS, 0–10), and ankle range of motion (ROM). Radiological variables: medial distal tibial articular angle (mDTAA), anterior distal tibial articular angle (aDTAA) and lateral talar station (LTS). Results: The clinical results showed the mean improvement in AOFAS hindfoot score from 42.12 ± SE 2.42 (Range: 9–72) preoperatively, to 96.02 ± SE 0.82 (Range: 78–100) at a mean follow-up of 12 months, with a highly statistically significant difference (p < 0.00001). Pain score (VAS) was 6.70 ± SE 0.28 (Range 0–10) preoperatively, and 0.26 ± SE 0.12 (Range: 0–3) at 12-month follow-up, with a highly statistically significant difference (p < 0.00001). ROM measurements preoperatively showed a mean of 22.55° ± SE 1.51° (Range: 0–50°), which showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.0001) to 45.43° ± SE 1.56° (Range: 25–60°) 12 months postoperatively. The radiological analyses revealed the following results: On the coronal view, the mDTAA preoperatively was 88.61 ± SE 0.70 (Range: 78.15–101.10), which improved to 89.46 ± SE 0.40 (Range: 81.95–95.80) at 12 months (not statistically significant—p = 0.94). On the sagittal view, the preoperative values of the aDTAA showed 82.66 ± SE 0.84 (Range: 70.35–107.47), which improved to 88.98 ± SE 0.47 (Range: 82.83–96.32) at 12 months postoperatively, with a highly statistically significant difference between preoperative and 12-months values (p < 0.00001). The mean LTS values for all patients were 3.95 mm ± SE 0.78 (Range: −11.52 to 13.89) preoperatively and 1.14 mm ± SE 0.63 (Range: −10.76 to 11.75) at 12 months, with a statistically significant difference between preoperative and 12-month follow-up (p = 0.01). The review of the radiological TAA osteointegration at 12 months showed no cases of loosening of the implanted TAAs. Two cases (4%) showed a radiolucency and one case (2%) a cyst on the tibial component; no cases had a change on the talar component. No TAA complication/revision surgeries were documented. Conclusion: In the present study, the lateral talar station of anteriorly subluxated ankles showed a significant improvement, i.e., physiological centralization of the talus, in the postoperative period when a mobile-bearing TAA was performed. The anterior/posterior congruency between the talar component and the mobile polyethylene insert of the mobile-bearing VANTAGE TAA allows the sagittal translation of the talus relative to the flat tibial component, reducing the prosthesis strain and failure.

Case: Case of a 2-staged revision surgical technique for the treatment of an aseptic total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) loosening: first surgery: removal of the loosened and painful TAA Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement, with exclusion of infection, and reconstruction of the large bone defect (bone-defect downsizing surgery); proof of successful ankle bone reconstruction by CT-scan imaging; second surgery: implantation of a primary VANTAGE TAA (ankle reconstruction with new primary TAA). Conclusion: The present case shows the management of a failed TAA with bone defect by performing a 2-step surgical approach: removal of loosened TAA with simultaneous bone stock restoration and then implantation of a new primary TAA. This concept is a possible alternative to a post-TAA ankle arthrodesis or to the use of a TAA revision system.

Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity is a progressive pathologic condition that results in a rigid, painful, arthritic flatfoot that is debilitating and affects daily function. Traditionally, the condition is treated with a Triple arthrodesis of the subtalar joint, talonavicular joint, and the calcaneocuboid joint through dual incisions. This approach is effective in restoring the medial arch and correcting excessive hindfoot valgus. However, the lateral incision is associated with wound-healing problems in up to one third of patients, while the calcaneocuboid joint is often asymptomatic and not arthritic. The medial-single-incision "Diple" arthrodesis is a valuable, efficient, and safe alternative to the traditional dual incision Triple arthrodesis. The Diple arthrodesis is performed through a single medial incision and is a fusion of the subtalar joint and talonavicular joint but sparing the calcaneocuboid joint. The advantages of the Diple arthrodesis is significantly reduced wound complication, decreased operating time, comparable union rates, and extensive intraoperative visualization. Furthermore, maintenance of the calcaneocuboid joint allows for improving accommodation on uneven surfaces along with prevention of adjacent joint degeneration. In this paper, we describe our experience with the medial-single-incision Diple arthrodesis in patients with adult-acquired flatfoot deformity.Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level V-expert opinion and surgical technique. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.