Engraftment was achieved in 43/45 (95%) recipients of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from HLA-compatible unrelated donors (n = 45), compared to all 45 patients in matched controls receiving bone marrow and 14/18 (78%) recipients of CD34-selected PBSC (P < 0.01). The time to reach ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/l was a median of 16 days in the PBSC and CD34 groups, compared to 20 days in the bone marrow controls (P < 0.001 vs PBSC). The time to reach platelets >50 x 10(9)/l was a median of 23 days in the PBSC group and 24 days in the CD34 group, which was significantly faster than 29 days in the bone marrow controls (P < 0.01). Acute GVHD grades II-IV developed in 30% in the PBSC group, 20% in the recipients of bone marrow and 18% in the CD34 group. The corresponding figures for chronic GVHD were 59%, 85% and 0% (P < 0.01) in the three groups, respectively. The probability of non-relapse death was 27% in the recipients of PBSC, 21% in the bone marrow controls and 60% in the CD34 group (NS). The 2-year leukaemia-free survival was 46% in the PBSC group, 41% in the bone marrow group and 25% in the CD34 group (NS).

Competitive inhibition of interleukin 2‐dependent lymphocytes by daclizumab demonstrates some beneficial effects in the treatment of graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). Sixteen patients with steroid refractory GVHD received daclizumab (1 mg/kg BW) on d 1, 2 (−5), 7, 14 and 21. Twelve patients suffered from grade III–IV acute GVHD and four patients from extensive chronic GVHD. Responses were observed in nine patients (six acute, three chronic GVHD). Fourteen out of 16 patients acquired infections during daclizumab treatment and three deaths were infection related. Daclizumab demonstrates limited activity and is associated with an increased incidence of infectious complications.

Long-wavelength UVA (340-400 nm UVA-1) phototherapy has been reported to be effective in atopic dermatitis, localized scleroderma and T-cell-derived skin diseases. We retrospectively investigated 70 patients with acute cutaneous GVHD after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation or donor lymphocyte infusion. Complete and partial responses with a median duration of 10 months were achieved in 49 (70%) and 17 (24.3%) patients, respectively. Overall, 47 (67.1%) patients were not treated with systemic steroids. Furthermore, immunosuppression could be tapered in 24 (34.3%) patients while they were receiving UVA-1 treatment. Responses were seen irrespective of age or type of conditioning. Treatment was very well tolerated. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 10-60) months, three patients developed epithelial skin neoplasia. We conclude that UVA-1 therapy is feasible, well tolerated and can be an effective treatment for acute GVHD of the skin, thereby avoiding the use of systemic steroids and/or allowing a more rapid tapering of systemic immunosuppression in a substantial number of patients. The results of this retrospective analysis warrant larger, prospective studies and the effectiveness of UVA-1 therapy should be compared with other established treatment modalities.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a new immunosuppressive drug successfully used in renal and heart transplant recipients, was used in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA), methotrexate (MTX) and prednisolone for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched, unrelated (n = 9) and related donors (n = 4) in an open single-centre phase II study. Thirteen patients, transplanted from HLA-mismatched donors of 18-57 yr of age, received 1 g MMF daily, starting at day 10, in addition to CsA and prednisolone for aGVHD prophylaxis. All patients were engrafted between days 13 and 15. Four of the 13 patients experienced aGVHD grade I/II (n = 2) and grade III (n = 2). All patients except 3 were alive on day 100 post-transplantation. No severe adverse effects of MMF were recorded. In our pilot study, we demonstrated that MMF can be used safely for the prophylaxis of aGVHD.

Summary:We report 27 patients with relapsed acute or chronic leukemia who underwent a second hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a related or unrelated donor. Seventeen patients were diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), six with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and four with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Ages ranged from 22 to 49 years (median 37); 13 patients were female and 14 male. Relapse was diagnosed between 1 and 45 months after the first HSCT. Sixteen patients who relapsed had received an autologous transplant initially and 11 an allogeneic transplant. Ten patients relapsed within 6 months and 17 patients later than 6 months. Chemotherapy was used as reinduction for relapse after HSCT in 16 patients who had received an autologous transplant and in three who had received an allogeneic transplant, since the latter did not respond to reduction of immunosuppression to induce a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reaction. Five of these 19 patients (26%) achieved complete remission (CR), seven patients did not respond to chemotherapy and seven achieved a partial remission (PR). The stem cell source for the second HSCT included bone marrow (n = 12) and PBSC (n = 4) from genotypically identical unrelated donors, PBSC (n = 7) and bone marrow (n = 3) from related donors. Currently eight of the 27 patients are alive and diseasefree after the second HSCT. One patient is alive and disease-free after two allogeneic transplants (day +1538), eight patients, who relapsed after an autologous transplant followed by an allogeneic transplant (days +248 to +1140), acute myeloid leukaemia (n = 6) and chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 2) are alive and diseasefree. The overall disease-free survival is 30% (8/27). The overall disease-free survival of autologous transplant patients subsequently undergoing an allogeneic transplant is 43% (P = 0.049). It is suggested that a second HSCT is possible for patients with leukemia relapse following the first autologous transplant. A second transplant might also be offered to patients relapsing after the first allogeneic HSCT. Keywords: second allogeneic bone marrow transplant; conditioning regimen; relapse rate; acute leukemia; diseasefree survivalThe relapse rate in patients transplanted for acute or chronic leukemia still ranges from 20-60%, accounting for one important cause of treatment failure. 1,2 Relapse rate correlates with diagnosis and stage of disease, 3,4 since patients transplanted either in relapse or after chemotherapy induction failure demonstrated a significantly higher risk for relapse compared to patients transplanted in complete remission. 5 The management of patients relapsing after HSCT is still controversial. 6,7 The therapeutic modalities for the treatment of leukemia relapse following allogeneic transplantation have been reviewed recently. [8][9][10] Options such as immunotherapy, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or a second allograft after myeloablative conditioning have been explored. 10 Despite the high treatment-related mortality with a second HSC ...