Levels of CRP are correlated to clinical and endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis patients.

Several studies have focused on the relationship between metabolic syndrome and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). They were based on GERD complications, whereas little is known about the association between metabolic syndrome and objectively measured esophageal acid exposure. The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between metabolic syndrome and GERD based on a 24-hour pH testing. It was a cross-sectional study including 100 consecutive patients who underwent a 24-hour pH-metry monitoring and were assessed for the five metabolic syndrome components as well as for body mass index (BMI). Among the 100 patients, 54 had a pathological acid GERD. The 46 GERD-free patients represented control group. Sex distribution was comparable between both groups but GERD patients were older than controls (44.59 vs. 37.63 years, P= 0.006) and more often obese or with overweight (83.3 vs. 60.9%, P= 0.01). Frequency of metabolic syndrome as a whole entity was higher among patients with GERD than those without GERD (50 vs. 19.56%; P= 0.002) with a crude odds ratio of 4.11 (95% confidence interval: 1.66-10.14). Multivariate regression analysis showed that metabolic syndrome as well as an age ≥ 30 years were independent factors associated to GERD but not BMI and sex. Abnormal waist circumference and fasting glucose level ≥ 100 mg/L were the only independent factors among the five components of metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome but not BMI was an independent factor associated to GERD. These results confirm the hypothesis that central obesity is associated to GERD.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography associated with sphincterotomy and stone extraction with balloon or Dormia basket represents the gold standard for the management of common bile duct stones. The aim of our study were to investigate the predictors of failure of standard endoscopic techniques during the management of common bile duct stones. Methods: A retrospective study including all endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones between January 2014 and December 2017 was conducted. First line treatment was based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon or Dormia extraction. Second line endoscopic treatment was based on macrodilatation of Oddi sphincter, mechanical lithotripsy, biliary stent or nasobiliary drain placement. Predictors of failure of standard endoscopic techniques were sought by uni and multivariate analysis (SPSS software, p significant if < 0.05). Results: One hundred eighty one patients (mean age 64 years and sex ratio M/W ¼ 0.4) were included. Main indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were residual or recurrent lithiasis (67.4%, n ¼ 122). Cholangiography revealed multiple stones in 53 patients with an average size of 12.5mm [3-40]. The success rate of first line treatment was 61.9%. Independent predictors of failure of standard endoscopic techniques (failure of papillary cannulation or stone extraction) according to multivariate analysis were: an age greater than 65 years OR 0.516 [0.272-0.979], an intra-diverticular papilla OR 0.179 [0.035-0.914], a common bile duct diameter greater than 15 mm OR 0.161 [0.068-0.385] and a stenosis of the common bile duct OR 0.068 [0.008-0.605]. The success rate of the second line treatment was 73%. Conclusion: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography results in a successful clearance of the common bile duct in almost two-thirds of patients. In case of predictors of failure, alternative techniques can increase this rate.