No abstract

. These results and in vitro DNA damage assays indicate that the protective effect of Dps on DNA most likely is exerted through a dual action, the physical association with DNA and the ability to nullify the toxic combination of Fe(II) and H 2 O 2 . In the latter process a hydrous ferric oxide mineral core is produced within the protein, thus avoiding oxidative damage mediated by Fenton chemistry.

UV-visible spectroscopy, electrode oximetry, and pH stat were used to study Fe(II) oxidation and hydrolysis in horse spleen ferritin (HoSF) and recombinant human H-chain and L-chain ferritins (HuHF and HuLF). Appropriate test reactions and electrode responses were measured, establishing the reliability of oxygen electrode/pH stat for kinetics studies of iron uptake by ferritin. Stoichiometric ratios, Fe(II)/O2 and H+/Fe(II), and rates of oxygen uptake and proton production were simultaneously measured as a function of iron loading of the protein. The data show a clear distinction between the diiron ferroxidase site and mineral surface catalyzed oxidation of Fe(II). The oxidation/hydrolysis reaction attributed to the ferroxidase site has been determined for the first time and is given by 2Fe2+ + O2 + 3H2O --> [Fe2O(OH)2]2+ + H2O2 + 2H+ where [Fe2O(OH)2]2+ represents the hydrolyzed dinuclear iron(III) center postulated to be a mu-oxo-bridged species from UV spectrometric titration data and absorption band maxima. The transfer of iron from the ferroxidase site to the mineral core has been now established to be [Fe2O(OH)2]2+ + H2O --> 2FeOOH(core) + 2H+. Regeneration of protein ferroxidase activity with time is observed for both HoSF and HuHF, consistent with their having enzymatic properties, and is facilitated by higher pH (7.0) and temperature (37 degreesC) and by the presence of L-subunit and is complete within 10 min. In accord with previous studies, the mineral surface reaction is given by 4Fe2+ + O2 + 6H2O --> 4FeOOH(core) + 8H+. As the protein progressively acquires iron, oxidation/hydrolysis increasingly shifts from a ferroxidase site to a mineral surface based mechanism, decreasing the production of H2O2.

Human ferritins sequester and store iron as a stable FeOOH (s) mineral core within a protein shell assembled from 24 subunits of two types, H and L. Core mineralization in recombinant H-and L-subunit homopolymer and heteropolymer ferritins and several site-directed H-subunit variants was investigated to determine the iron oxidation/hydrolysis chemistry as a function of iron flux into the protein.Stopped-flow absorption spectrometry, UV spectrometry, and electrode oximetry revealed that the mineral core forms by at least three pathways, not two as previously thought. They correspond to the ferroxidase, mineral surface, and the Fe(II) + H 2 O 2 detoxification reactions, respectively:

Delivery of iron to cells requires binding of two iron-containing human transferrin (hTF) molecules to the specific homodimeric transferrin receptor (TFR) on the cell surface. Through receptor-mediated endocytosis involving lower pH, salt, and an unidentified chelator, iron is rapidly released from hTF within the endosome. The crystal structure of a monoferric N-lobe hTF/TFR complex (3.22-Å resolution) features two binding motifs in the N lobe and one in the C lobe of hTF. Binding of Fe N hTF induces global and site-specific conformational changes within the TFR ectodomain. Specifically, movements at the TFR dimer interface appear to prime the TFR to undergo pH-induced movements that alter the hTF/TFR interaction. Iron release from each lobe then occurs by distinctly different mechanisms: Binding of His349 to the TFR (strengthened by protonation at low pH) controls iron release from the C lobe, whereas displacement of one N-lobe binding motif, in concert with the action of the dilysine trigger, elicits iron release from the N lobe. One binding motif in each lobe remains attached to the same α-helix in the TFR throughout the endocytic cycle. Collectively, the structure elucidates how the TFR accelerates iron release from the C lobe, slows it from the N lobe, and stabilizes binding of apohTF for return to the cell surface. Importantly, this structure provides new targets for mutagenesis studies to further understand and define this system.