Objectives-To evaluate the impact of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields on markers of human fertility. Methods-A follow up study of time to pregnancy, semen quality, and reproductive hormones was conducted among couples planning first pregnancies (36 males were welders and 21 were non-welders). The male and the female partner were monitored for exposure to ELF magnetic field by personal exposure meters. As summary measures of exposure the median value was calculated together with the 75 percentile value and the proportion of measurements exceeding 0.2 and 1.0 µT, respectively. Each summary measure was divided in three categories: low, medium, and high. Results-Couples in which the man had a medium or a high proportion of measurements >1.0 µT had a reduced probability of conception per menstrual cycle compared with the men with low exposure, but the result was only significant for the men with medium exposure. This finding was partly attributable to a high probability of conception per menstrual cycle among the men with low exposure compared with non-welders in the original cohort of 430 couples. Other summary measures were not related to probability of conception or other markers of fertility. A possible negative association was found between high probability of conception and female exposure measures based on the median, the 75 percentile, and the proportion of measurements >0.2 µT, but no association was found with the proportion of measurements >1.0 µT. Conclusions-The findings provide no consistent support for a hypothesis of a deleterious eVect of low level ELF magnetic fields on markers of human fertility. However, due to the relatively small size of the studied population only large associations would be detected. (Occup Environ Med 1999;56:253-255)
Objectives The association between fertility and job strain defined as high job demands and low job control has not previously been studied. A follow-up study was conducted with prospective collection of information on job strain among women, achievement of pregnancy, and potential confounding variables. Methods A total of 297 Danish couples without previous reproductive experience was followed for a maximum of 6 menstrual cycles from termination of birth control until pregnancy. Job demand and job control were measured by a questionnaire developed by Karasek and his co-workers. Results The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for conception per menstrual cycle for women with high job strain was 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.5) when compared with that of women in low-strain jobs. Only in secondary analyses restricted to couples with no suspected competitive causes of reduced fertility was a statistically significant reduced odds found for women with high-strain jobs compared with all otherjobs. C O~C~U S~O~S The main finding of this study did not corroborate a hypothesis of a substantial detrimental effect of job strain on fecundability.
Subfecundity is a frequent and serious problem that may sometimes be preventable, but we need to know more about its determinants. Different epidemiologic designs are available. The best of these use prospectively collected data from the population, but they are time consuming, expensive and often hampered by low-participation rates. Most patients undergoing infertility treatment are closely monitored for clinical reasons, making it feasible to use secondary data to study the period from conception to implantation and pregnancy. In spite that infertility patients are highly selected, there are specific exposure-effect relations that can be studied in cohorts of infertility patients. These patients offer a potentially useful setting for studying exposures that operate late in fertilization, whereas the designs may be inadequate to identify exposures that cause reduced sperm counts, anovulation and total occlusion. The clinical sampling and the treatment set limitations for what can be studied. In certain situations, infertile patients can, however, provide useful epidemiologic evidence for learning about the causes of subfecundity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.