Three and five times weekly narrow-band TL-01 (311-313 nm) ultraviolet (UV) B phototherapy regimens for chronic plaque psoriasis were compared in a randomized, observer-blinded, half-body, within-patient paired study. Twenty-one patients [13 men, eight women, age range 21-68 years, skin phototypes I (two patients), II (14) and III (five)] entered the study. Sixteen reached clearance or minimal residual activity (MRA) on both sides. Of the other five, three withdrew because they did not reach clearance or MRA on the 5x weekly side by a maximum of 30 treatments, one when he was satisfied with moderate improvement and one because of repeated failure to attend. Those who completed treatment reached clearance or MRA after a median of 35 days with 5x weekly treatment compared with 40 days with 3x weekly treatment (P = 0.007), but required a median of 23.5 compared with 17 UVB exposures (P = 0.001) and 94 minimal erythema dose multiples (MEDs) compared with 64 MEDs (P = 0.01). Fifteen (of 16) developed at least one episode of well-demarcated erythema during 5x weekly treatment compared with just three of 16 treated 3x weekly (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between regimens in duration of remission. For this skin phototype I-III population, the more rapid clearance of psoriasis with 5x weekly phototherapy is not, for the majority of patients, sufficient to justify the extra exposures and higher UVB dose. We no longer use 5x weekly phototherapy for psoriasis.
Narrowband (311-313 nm) ultraviolet B phototherapy with the Philips TL-01 lamp is used increasingly in the treatment of psoriasis with little information available on the optimum irradiation regimen. We compared a high and a low incremental dose regimen in 20 patients with symmetrical chronic plaque psoriasis using a randomized half body study and thrice weekly exposures. Paired trunk, leg and arm plaques of psoriasis were scored blind prior to and at each treatment for scaling, erythema and induration. Patients were treated to clearance or minimal residual activity and followed up until relapse. The low increment regimen achieved a 10% reduction in the median cumulative dose to clearance (16,401 vs. 18,246 mJ/cm2) with one extra treatment in 50% of the patients. However, the duration of treatment (median 53.5 days) was identical for both regimens except for one patient because there were 50% fewer episodes of erythema requiring postponement of treatment with the low increment regimen. We now favour the low increment regimen for phototherapy in our psoriasis population.
When administered according to these regimens in a skin phototype I-III population, TL-01 UVB is more efficacious than TMP bath-PUVA in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis.
Despite a widely held belief that the use of emollients prior to broad-band UVB irradiation accelerates clearance of psoriasis, only one single-blind controlled study exists in support of this. No similar study has been carried out with photochemotherapy (PUVA) or narrow-band UVB (311-313 nm) phototherapy. As some emollients absorb UV radiation, and thereby inhibit psoriasis clearance, there is a need to identify emollients suitable for pre-irradiation use. Coconut oil may be useful in this respect. In two randomized groups of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis undergoing either routine PUVA (n = 14) or narrow-band UVB phototherapy (n = 15), a single-blind controlled (half-body) study was undertaken to assess the effect of pre-irradiation application of coconut oil. Patients were given PUVA twice weekly, or TL-01 therapy thrice weekly. The initial UV dose was 70% of previously determined minimal phototoxic (MPD) or minimal erythema doses (MED), with 40% incremental steps at each visit (reduced if adverse effects occurred). Psoriasis severity was scored on each side after every three treatments. No significant acceleration of psoriasis clearance was seen in either group. We do not, therefore, recommend the routine use of emollients prior to PUVA or TL-01 therapy when using near erythemogenic irradiation regimens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.