The purpose of this work was to compare technetium-99m-diphosphono-propanedicarboxylate (DPD) and iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scans in the diagnosis and follow-up of neuroblastoma, and to study the role of histological differentiation in the uptake of MIBG. The uptake of MIBG and of DPD were studied retrospectively in 27 patients with neuroblastoma (primary, residual and recurrent tumours as well as bone and bone marrow metastases). The findings were related to the histological classification of the tumours as neuroblastoma (N1), differentiating neuroblastoma (N2) or ganglioneuroblastoma (N3). Uptake of MIBG by the primary tumour occurred in 17 of 19 patients, either at diagnosis or during follow-up. There were only two false-negatives with MIBG, both of which were N3. Ten patients were studied preoperatively with both MIBG and DPD. The primary tumour showed MIBG uptake in nine of the ten and DPD uptake in eight of them. Thirty-five sites of cortical bone metastasis were shown in eight patients by both MIBG and DPD, 12 sites in seven patients by MIBG only and seven sites in five patients by DPD only. In 14 patients both MIBG and bone scan were negative. Overall, MIBG demonstrated more lesions than DPD. Retrospectively several hot spots seen only with the bone scan are to be considered as false-positive. The highest incidence of false-negative MIBG and bone scans was observed in ganglioneuroblastoma with a predominance of the more mature component (ganglioneuroma).
This study confirms that dipyridamole is more accurate than exercise in excluding LAD coronary artery disease. However, there are still false-positive results and the severity of the septal or anteroseptal perfusion defect does not add additional information to identify LAD coronary artery disease. Coronary angiography is thus necessary for positive dipyridamole study results to identify coronary artery disease as a major prognostic factor in patients with LBBB.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.