No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The usual assumption is that African rice {Oryza glaberrima Sfeud.) originated about 3500 yr ago from fhe annual wild rice, Oryza barthii A. Chev., and Asian rice {Oryza sativa L.) was introduced info West Africa in fhe lafe 15fh century CE) by the Europeans. Evidences from several social science and biological science disciplines have been collated and/or reinferpreted to draw the following inferences: (i) There are several accounts of rice culture in northern and western Africa from early centuries of the Common Era; (ii) The Senegamblan monoliths, linked to the fime of origin of African rice as 3500 yr ago, have been carbon dafed fo the 7th century CE; (iii) Neolithic culture had hardly reached tropical West Africa 3500 yr ago; (iv) The characteristics of O. barthii vis-à-vis the two cultivated rices-bigger grains, higher yields, easy crossability with both intermediate features, and weediness-may suggest its hybrid nature; and (v) The rarity of O. glaberrima beginning with the time of its initial identification, acceptance of local farmers to having both rices growing together, repeated discovery of O. glaberrima-Wke forms in non-African rice regions, and prevalence of close colinearify between the two cultivated rices at molecular and chromosomal levels suggest their close relationships. These factors indicate that African rice might have evolved from Asian rice, and that the wild rice, O. barthii, might be a hybrid derivative of the two cultivated rices.