Epizootic Rabbit Enteropathy (ERE) is a disease of unknown aetiology that mainly affects postweaning animals. Caecotrophs from animals in a farm affected by ERE were analysed to identify changes in the microbiological profile of growing rabbits. Does and kits at weaning (28 d) and the same rabbits ten days later (38 d) were used for a comparison using Roche 454 pyrosequencing of hypervariable V3-V5 regions of the 16S rRNA genes. The caecal bacterial community was dominated by the Firmicutes phylum (about 80%), followed by Bacteroidetes (15%), although relative abundances changed according to animal age (among does and kits at 28 and 38 d) and health status (affected or not by ERE). Two dominant families were classified within the Firmicutes phylum: Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae (50 and 20% of the sequences, respectively). In kits affected by ERE, relative abundance of Ruminococcus and Bacteroides genera decreased and increased, respectively, compared to healthy kits at the same age (28 and 38 d). The principal coordinate analysis plot revealed that kits at 28 d of age cluster together and apart from the does and the healthy 38-d rabbit groups. When only growing rabbits are considered, kits that showed symptoms of ERE clustered separately. Results suggest a different caecal bacterial community of rabbits affected by ERE. These findings highlight the need to identify different stages of the disease.
AbstrAct:The effect of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and neutral detergent soluble fibre (NDSF) on in vivo faecal digestibility and caecal fermentation pattern was studied in growing rabbits, in 4 diets formulated according to 2 levels of NDF, 370 (LI) and 450 (HI) g/kg, and 2 levels of NDSF, 150 (LS) and 180 (HS) g/ kg in substitution of starch, in a 2×2 factorial structure. Twenty four New Zealand White rabbits weaned at 28 d (630±80.2 g weight) were allocated to digestibility cages from 42 to 49 d of age to determine apparent faecal digestibility of each diet (n=6). Urine was collected for determination of purine derivatives (PD). Once the digestibility trial finished, rabbits were fitted with PVC neck collars for 24 h total caecotrophe collection. After 1 d of recovery, animals were slaughtered and caecal contents were used as inocula for 18 h in vitro gas production and caecal degradation (ivDMcD) study, using an HCl-pepsin and pancreatin pre-digested substrate. Diet digestibility was also determined by the in vitro three-step enzymatic procedure. There were no effects of the NDF×NDSF interaction for any digestibility parameter (P>0.10). Both dry matter and organic matter digestibility (DMd and OMd) decreased from 0.518 to 0.442 and from 0.526 to 0.447, respectively, with the increase of NDF (P<0.001), but were unaffected by the NDSF level (P>0.10). In contrast, NDF digestibility (NDFd) and ivDMcD did not respond to NDF (P>0.10) but increased from 0.156 to 0.200 and 0.141 to 0.210 with the proportion of NDSF (P<0.01). Weight of caecal contents increased with both NDF (P<0.001) and NDSF content (P<0.01). However, total production of caecotrophes increased from 20.1 to 25.5 g DM/d with NDF (P<0.05), but was not affected by NDSF. The crude protein (CP) proportion in caecotrophes decreased with NDF (P<0.001) and increased with NDSF level (P<0.01), and total CP recycled as caecotrophes tended (P=0.093) to be higher in HS diets, being unaffected by the dietary level of NDF. Diets rich in NDSF rendered higher gas volumes (P<0.001) than those with LS from 2 to 18 h incubation, whereas inclusion of high proportions of NDF reduced gas volume (P<0.01). Results indicate that NDF reduces faecal digestibility, whereas NDSF promotes better conditions for caecal fermentation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.