No abstract

SummaryStudies in experimental animals have demonstrated that there is a relationship between levels of low molecular weight (LMW) heparin and both bleeding and inhibition of thrombosis. The relationship between these outcomes and ex vivo anti-factor Xa levels has been examined in 163 patients undergoing total hip replacement who were given prophylaxis once daily with a LMW heparin (enoxaparine). Fifty patients received 60 mg of enoxaparine and 113 received 40 mg, both regimens being administered subcutaneously once daily. Blood samples for anti-factor Xa levels were collected 12 hours after the injection on the day of surgery and on days 1, 3 and 6, postoperatively. The incidence of wound hematoma was 5.3% when the maximum anti-factor Xa level was ≤0.2 units per ml, but increased to 24.5% when the anti-factor Xa level exceeded 0.2 units per ml, P = 0.0008. The incidence of postoperative thrombosis was low (6.3%) if the minimum anti-factor Xa level exceeded 0.1 units per ml, but increased to 14.6% when ≤0.1 units per ml, and to 18.8% if the anti-factor Xa level was ≤0.05 units per ml. Regression analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant relationship between anti-factor Xa level and wound hematoma, P = 0.002 and anti-factor Xa level and thrombosis, P = 0.03. These findings suggest that when enoxaparine is administered as a once daily subcutaneous injection, the 12 hour anti-factor Xa level should not exceed 0.2 units per ml to minimize bleeding and levels >0.05 units per ml should be obtained to optimize efficacy.

SummaryA double blind randomized trial comparing subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) with standard unfractionated calcium heparin administered at a dose of 5,000 units every 8 hours in patients undergoing elective hip replacement has been performed. Treatment regimens began 12 hours preoperatively with enoxaparin, 2 hours preoperatively with standard unfractionated calcium heparin, and were continued for 15 days or until discharge. Venography was performed in all patients. Two hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the study: 113 received unfractionated heparin and 124 received enoxaparin. The incidence of proximal deep vein thrombosis was reduced from 18.5% in the unfractionated heparin group to 7.5% in the enoxaparin group (p = 0.014), and the incidence of total deep vein thrombosis was similarly reduced from 25% to 12.5% (p = 0.03). There were two major bleeding episodes and one minor bleed in the enoxaparin group compared to two minor bleeds in the unfractionated heparin group. Patients who received enoxaparin required fewer red blood cell transfusions and had a significantly higher hemoglobin on postoperative days 3 and 4. Thus prophylaxis with enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, is simple, safe and more effective than standard low dose unfractionated heparin in preventing deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip replacement.

Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, has been used together with spinal or general anaesthesia in a prospective, randomised study of 188 consecutive elective hip replacements. Bilateral venography was performed on all patients on day 13 after operation. Group I (65 patients) received spinal anaesthesia and no immediate injection of enoxaparin. Group II (61 patients) received spinal anaesthesia and 20 mg of enoxaparin one hour after the onset of anaesthesia. Group III (62 patients) was operated on under general anaesthesia and received 40 mg of enoxaparin 12 hours prior to surgery. This group acted as the control group. In all three groups, 40 mg of enoxaparin was given 12 hours after the end of surgery and continued on a once-daily basis. Proximal DVT occurred in 6% of group I, 6.7% of group II and 6.5% of group III, not a significant difference. Distal DVT was present in 11% of group I, 5% of group II and 0% of group III; this was a highly significant difference (p = 0.007). Tolerance was good and the incidence of bleeding low in the three groups. Our results confirm the low rate of DVT in patients operated on under general anaesthesia with the standard procedure of 40 mg of enoxaparin on a once-daily basis started pre-operatively. The 40 mg-dose is also safe and effective in association with spinal anaesthesia if half the dose (20 mg) is injected an hour after the lumbar puncture.

Bilateral venography was performed between 12 and 15 days after total hip replacement in 745 consecutive patients, all of whom had heparin prophylaxis. Of these, 81 patients (10.8%) showed evidence of recent deep vein thrombosis: 23 (3%) distal, 44 (5.9%) isolated proximal, five (0.7%) both proximal and distal, and nine (1.2%) extensive thrombosis from calf to thigh. Compared with previous reports heparin appeared to have reduced the number of distal and contralateral thromboses, but was far less effective in reducing proximal femoral thrombosis. In a cadaver study, the femoral veins were inspected during simulated total hip replacement by either an anterior or a posterior approach. In every case the femoral vein became kinked or folded in the thigh position imposed during the preparation of the femur. Local damage appears to be an important factor in proximal thrombosis; care at operation could help to minimise trauma to the femoral veins and reduce the number of such cases.