No abstract

The interrater reliability of the AMP system and the Comprehensive Psychiatric Rating Scale (CPRS) was compared in a sample of 30 hospitalized schizophrenic or depressive patients. The CPRS proved to have on average a slightly higher reliability on both the level of items and primary scales. The reliability of the secondary scales was nearly identical.

A sample of 161 schizophrenic and depressive patients were interviewed in a Stockholm hospital to find out whether the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale construction carried out by Maurer et al. [Int. Pharmacopsychiat. 17: 338–353, 1982] and valid for German-speaking areas could be reproduced with a Swedish-speaking sample. Only the superimposed 2-factor solution resembled, in its factor-structure, that of Maurer et al. (depressive and schizophrenic syndrome). The fact that a ‘depressive’ syndrome was found instead of a ‘manic-depressive’ syndrome, is to be attributed to the different sample compositions.

No abstract

Using a sample of 170 patients the psychopathological contents of the AMP system and the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) were compared by canonical correlations. The nine primary AMP scales predict 86% of the variance of the three CPRS scales. 64% of the variance of the nine AMP scales is explained by the CPRS scales. The secondary scales are nearly equivalent. The univariate analysis showed that all AMP scales with the exception of the ‘hostility syndrome’ and the ‘catatonic syndrome’ correlate highly with one of the psychopathological CPRS scales.