The prevalence of antenatal care shared between general practitioner (GP) and public hospital services in Brisbane, and its acceptability to patients was assessed. Responses to questionnaires put to women in the immediate puerperium of the public wards of 2 major teaching hospitals are presented. Antenatal shared-care was undertaken in 54% of pregnancies. Indications of advantages for women to undergo antenatal shared-care were identified with convenience of appointment time, and decreased travel and waiting time. An important cooperation between GP and hospital obstetric services appears to have evolved in the area of antenatal care that provide benefits at least for patients' convenience.

CAFs increases tumor growth while knockdown of CNTFR in lung tumor cells decreases overall growth. With the use of advanced protein engineering technology, we generated a high-affinity CNTFR decoy that inhibits CLCF1-CNTFR signaling and are currently testing this novel reagent to elucidate the mechanism by which CNTFR activation alters intercellular signaling to increase tumor cell growth. Through in vivo studies with cell lines and PDXs, we are also exploring the efficacy of this CNTFR decoy as a form of lung cancer therapy. Conclusion:In sum, these data indicate that CLCF1-CNTFR signaling is important for NSCLC tumor growth and is a viable therapeutic target.

Background Squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus comprises approximately 30% of oesophageal malignancies in the ‘west’. Different approaches in management have been advocated. In the UK patients may receive conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OEO2) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CROSS). The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients receiving potentially curative surgical treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent treatment with curative intent for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma between 2006 to 2016 at a single institution was performed. Patients underwent a standardised staging protocol and were assigned to the treatment modality based on the stage of the disease by a multi-disciplinary team. Outcomes were evaluated according to the treatment received. Results Overall 199 patients underwent curative treatment in the 10 year period. This comprised 26% of the oesophagectomies for carcinoma. Of these, 168 patients had disease which was staged T3 and above or had evidence of nodal disease. 81% of these patients received neo-adjuvant treatment, 108 receiving chemotherapy alone and 29 receiving chemoradiotherapy. The remaining 31 patients underwent surgery alone. There was no significant difference in the clinical staging between the three treatment modalities, (P = 0.25). There were 31 patients with early (T1/2 N0) cancer that underwent unimodality treatment in the form of surgery. Estimated median survival was 85 months for those that received chemotherapy and 53 months chemoradiotherapy (P = 0.45). Within the surgical group those patients with locally advanced disease (T3 + or N + ) median survival was 19 months; median survival was not reached for early cancers. Conclusion Both chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting combined with radical surgery enable excellent long-term outcomes to be achieved. Data from the Neo-aegis trial will hopefully inform which neoadjuvant treatment confers the greatest survival advantage. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

No abstract

Background Surgery remains the fundamental modality for achieving disease cure in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma In those with locally advanced disease, in the UK, is usually used in conjunction with perioperative chemotherapy as per the Magic trial. Not all patients manage to progress to the adjuvant component of the chemotherapy regimen, and its impact on outcome has not been determined. The aim of this review was to compare outcomes in those patients that received neoadjuvant treatment only with those that received neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent treatment with curative intent for locally advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma between 2006 to 2016 at a single institution was performed. Outcomes of patients who were staged T3 and above or had evidence of nodal disease and received perioperative chemotherapy were reviewed. Outcomes were stratified according to whether patients received only neoadjuvant chemotherapy or both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Results A total of 413 patients underwent transthoracic oesophagectomy and two field lymphadenectomy with perioperative chemotherapy. 276 (67%) received only neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with 137 (33%) receiving at least one cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy. Pathological staging was comparable between groups (P = 0.17). Overall estimated median survival was 30 months (neoadjuvant only) Versus 37 months (Both) P = 0.2. In patients that were found to be node positive median survival was 22 months (neoadjuvant) versus 28 months (both) P = 0.21. For node negative patients median survival was not reached in both groups. Conclusion These results indicate a trend towards improved survival with the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy. This may be of greater impact in those patients with nodal involvement. Further studies are required to fully evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients surgically treated for oesophageal cancer. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.