Several significant archaeological sites which were discovered during recent extensive infrastructural works in Serbia were lost for present generations due to misleading of legal procedures conducted by entitled institutions. Those cases belong to infamous group of numerous archaeological sites and architectural heritage at the territory of Serbia, which were firstly legally, and subsequently in every other way, lost in the last several decades.

u radu se razmatra teza da je za Republiku Srbiju osnovni činilac koji deter-miniše njenu politiku u oblasti klimatskih promena određen mogućnostima saradnje između država u slivu reke Dunav. u tom smislu zagovara se stav da je za RS najznačajniji pravac međunarodnih aktivnosti u oblasti klimatskih pro-mena i životne sredine u celini, saradnja sa državama koje se nalaze u slivu reke Dunav. Takav zaključak je zasnovan na proceni značaja koji reka Dunav ima za RS, kao i na činjenici da već postoje ustanovljene forme saradnje između država u slivu ove reke, na način da su obuhvaćeni ključni vodni resrusi u RS. Istovre-meno, procenjuje se da bi institucionalizacija saradnje između država u slivu reke Drine, kao i usklađivanje nacionalnih propisa sa propisima Eu, doprineli daljem unapređivanju sistema upravljanja vodnim resursima u slivu reke Dunav. Ključne reči: klimatske promene, upravljanje vodnim resursima, Eu inte-gracije, Dunav, Republika Srbija 1. Uvod Značaj vodnih resursa za savremenu politiku u oblasti klimatskih promena formalizovan je u postojećoj definiciji pojma "klimatske promene", odnosno "klimatski sistem" iz okvirne konvencije uN o promeni klime, i to na relativno prepoznatljiv način. Termin "klimatski sistem" označava "celinu koja obuhvata", * Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd, Rad je realizovan u okviru naučnih projekata Ministarstva prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja Republike Srbije: "Srbija u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima: strateški pravci razvoja i učvršćivanja položaja Srbije u međunarodnim integrativnim procesima-spoljnopolitički, međunarodni ekonomski, pravni i bezbednosni aspekti", (broj 179029), i "unapređenje javnih politika u Srbiji u funkciji poboljšanja socijalne sigurnosti građana i održivog privrednog rasta" (broj 47004).

In recent decades, heritage conservation has been extended to a very diverse field of construction, including industrial heritage, numerous forms of housing (not just representative!) and other diverse types of buildings. There is an obvious tendency to protect the significant legacy of global civilization development. As "younger" examples of heritage, such goods are more suitable and susceptible to large interventions and modernization. In this way, preserved and renovated buildings enrich the city's cultural image and lifestyle. Observed in this way, the preservation of heritage is one of the essential parts of the modernization and identification of social identity. The community identifies itself with preserved heritage and supports various ideas on how to present it and use it. The feeling that their protection also implies significant constraints in the manifestation of forms and features is something worth to discuss internationally. Such an approach is, however, becoming more and more flexible, especially since the beginning of the 21st century. The question arises as to what happens to the originally established values of the cultural property that has been altered by large interventions? Is it compulsory to reevaluate and determine the newly created value? Should we wait to create a certain historical distance in order to re-establish the value, or how long it should take to determine whether the interventions have created a new value of a whole that makes a cultural good and interventions in it and with it? The number of questions is great, and the experience of the need for re-evaluation is still very modest. That is a process that is constantly refreshed with new ideas, techniques, technologies, and following the civilization development of the society in which the events unfold. Many ways to encourage further research on this topic are just opening up.

Heritage is a version of the past seen through objects and settings, displays and engagements, spectacular locations and events, memories and recollections, and places for cultural purposes, but also for everyday consumption. Taken together, these "things" and practices have played a central role in structuring and defining the way heritage is understood in theoretical debate, public policy. Accordingly, there was the question of how all this was formalized as the focus of research during the last thirty years. During this time frame, emphasis has undoubtedly evolved from concerns about the objects themselves, their classification, conservation, and interpretation, to the way they are consumed and expressed as notions of culture, identity, and politics. More recently, heritage researchers have also begun to engage in engagement processes and construct meaning, so that the post-post-structural or more than representative maze of individual, affective, experiential, and embodied themes has come to be considered extremely important for the future of heritage. As a consequence of these theoretical achievements, the relatively long period of conceptual stability that surrounds even critical notions of heritage is now beginning to falter and disintegrate through debates that are increasingly dynamic. "Authenticity", "memory", "place", "representation", "dissonance" and "identity" are examples of types of concepts that are either challenged or refreshed as new forms of thinking. They were taken over and applied from the broader social sciences and began to intensively influence and encourage new theoretical attitudes and predictions. The result of these discussions should be a better and more clearly defined intellectual core of heritage treatment in the future.

IZVLEČEK