Although the Ross II operation is difficult and harbors significant risk, it remains an option for patients with irreparable mitral disease who have a long life expectancy and who cannot be placed on lifelong anticoagulation.
This report highlights the need for close surveillance of bioprosthetic valves. Unaccountable degeneration of bioprosthetic valves can develop early after implantation and usually requires replacing the failed valve with a mechanical prosthesis.
Between July 1997 and August 2004, 92 patients with irreparable mitral valves underwent replacement with a pulmonary autograft. This report brings the follow-up data of these patients up to date. Eighty-eight patients had a successful Ross II operation; 4 were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 94 months. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a successful outcome in all 88 patients immediately after the operation. Operative mortality was 4.6%, and late mortality definitely related to the operation was 12.5%. At a mean follow-up of 94 months, freedom from structural valve deterioration (significant mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation) was 93.4%, freedom from reoperation was 92.0%, and freedom from all causes of death was 82.9%. Two autografts were explanted because of endocarditis. Two patients developed significant pulmonary stenosis, one of whom underwent operative repair. These data compare favorably with those of mitral valve replacement using modern bioprostheses. This procedure remains an option for the relatively young patient when life-long anticoagulation is contraindicated or impractical. It is also an option to consider in infants with complex irreparable mitral valve disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.