The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of COVID-19 disease in the French national population of dialysis patients, their course of illness and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality. Our study included all patients on dialysis recorded in the French REIN Registry in April 2020. Clinical characteristics at last follow-up and the evolution of COVID-19 illness severity over time were recorded for diagnosed cases (either suspicious clinical symptoms, characteristic signs on the chest scan or a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) for SARS-CoV-2. A total of 1,621 infected patients were reported on the REIN registry from March 16th, 2020 to May 4th, 2020. Of these, 344 died. The prevalence of COVID-19 patients varied from less than 1% to 10% between regions. The probability of being a case was higher in males, patients with diabetes, those in need of assistance for transfer or treated at a self-care unit. Dialysis at home was associated with a lower probability of being infected as was being a smoker, a former smoker, having an active malignancy, or peripheral vascular disease. Mortality in diagnosed cases (21%) was associated with the same causes as in the general population. Higher age, hypoalbuminemia and the presence of an ischemic heart disease were statistically independently associated with a higher risk of death. Being treated at a selfcare unit was associated with a lower risk. Thus, our study showed a relatively low frequency of COVID-19 among dialysis patients contrary to what might have been assumed.
Mesenteric ischaemia should be systematically suspected in patients experiencing abdominal pain during or after dialysis sessions. Prompt diagnosis and treatment usually allow for a favourable prognosis.
A very high percentage of Li-treated outpatients have low eGFR. GFR monitoring is neglected in these patients, the majority of whom are no longer attending specialized clinics. Hypercalcaemia is less common but serum calcium monitoring is even more neglected. Ambulatory laboratory database surveillance provides a powerful means to contribute to CKD screening and monitoring.
SummaryBackground L-carnitine levels decrease rapidly and steadily with duration of hemodialysis, and carnitine depletion can impair response to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). The study hypothesis was that L-carnitine supplementation during the first year of hemodialysis would improve this response.Design, setting, participants, & measurements From October 2006 through March 2010, this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study assigned 92 incident hemodialysis patients to receive placebo or 1 g of intravenous L-carnitine after each dialysis session for 1 year. The primary outcome measure compared the groups for rHuEPO resistance index (EPO-RI), defined as weekly rHuEPO doses (IU/kg body weight divided by hemoglobin level) (g/dl).
ResultsIn the L-carnitine group, carnitine concentration increased from a mean 6 SD of 79651 mmol/L to 2586137 mmol/L; in the placebo group, it declined from 68625 mmol/L to 53624 mmol/L (interaction group 3 time, P,0.001). Carnitine deficiency affected about 30% of the patients in the placebo group during the study period. EPO-RI varied from 15.8611.3 to 9.565.8 IU/kg per g/dl in the placebo group and from 20.6612.8 to 15.6615.9 IU/kg per g/dl in the L-carnitine group, for a mean variation of 23.94612.5 IU/kg per g/dl and 22.98615.5 IU/kg per g/dl, respectively (P=0.7). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the EPO-RI course was similar in each group (difference between groups, P=0.10; interaction group 3 time, P=0.9).Conclusions Carnitine levels decrease by about 11%633% during the first year of hemodialysis. Treatment of incident hemodialysis patients with L-carnitine does not improve their response to rHuEPO.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.