The subject of seismic detection of abnormally high‐pressured formations has received a great deal of attention in exploration and production geophysics because of increasing exploration and production activities in frontier areas (such as the deepwater) and a need to lower cost without compromising safety and environment, and manage risk and uncertainty associated with very expensive drilling. The purpose of this review is to capture the “best practice” in this highly specialized discipline and document it. Pressure prediction from seismic data is based on fundamentals of science, especially those of rock physics and seismic attribute analysis. Nonetheless, since the first seismic application in the 1960s, practitioners of the technology have relied increasingly on empiricism, and the fundamental limitations of the tools applied to detect such hazardous formations were lost. The most successful approach to seismic pressure prediction is one that combines a good understanding of rock properties of subsurface formations with the best practice for seismic velocity analysis appropriate for rock physics applications, not for stacking purposes. With the step change that the industry has seen in the application of the modern digital computing technology to solving large‐scale exploration and production problems using seismic data, the detection of pressured formations can now be made with more confidence and better resolution. The challenge of the future is to break the communication and the “language barrier” that still exists between the seismologists, the rock physicists, and the drilling community.

No abstract

a b s t r a c tTo determine the impact of seeps and focused flow on the occurrence of shallow gas hydrates, several seafloor mounds in the Atwater Valley lease area of the Gulf of Mexico were surveyed with a wide range of seismic frequencies. Seismic data were acquired with a deep-towed, Helmholz resonator source (220-820 Hz); a high-resolution, Generator-Injector air-gun (30-300 Hz); and an industrial air-gun array (10-130 Hz). Each showed a significantly different response in this weakly reflective, highly faulted area. Seismic modeling and observations of reversed-polarity reflections and small scale diffractions are consistent with a model of methane transport dominated regionally by diffusion but punctuated by intense upward advection responsible for the bathymetric mounds, as well as likely advection along pervasive filamentous fractures away from the mounds.Published by Elsevier Ltd.

No abstract

No abstract