Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the level of awareness and knowledge of first aid for burns among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study between September 2 and December 5, 2019, via a self-administered online questionnaire among healthcare workers at a university hospital. The questionnaire comprised 24 questions divided into two sections pertaining to demographics and first aid for burns. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Results: We included 1,438 respondents in this study. Females comprised 68.2% (982) of the respondents. A total of 513 respondents (35.7%) were medical students. The mean burn knowledge score of all respondents was 8.07 ± 2.03 out of 13. Interestingly, 940 individuals (65.4%) used traditional medications on the burn area. Knowledge regarding antibiotic use in burn injuries was poor—1,199 (82.3%) study participants agreed that antibiotics are beneficial in the case of burns, which is a wrong act. The mean knowledge score was significantly different across groups of different ages, sexes, nationalities, marital statuses, and job positions ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The level of awareness of first aid for burn patients among healthcare workers was insufficient, and the unnecessary use of traditional medicines and antibiotics in burn patients being high. Moreover, this study confirmed the need for an effective educational program among healthcare workers.

No abstract

BACKGROUND Across the globe, Pressure Injury (PI) has been implicated billion costs annually and mortality were 60,000 deaths out of 2.5 million hospitalized patients from complication related to PI. Through avoiding PI will avoid the incidence of other illnesses, decrease the financial costs and improve the quality of life for our patients. OBJECTIVE Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to identify most influential factors which increase the risk of developing pressure injuries among hospitalized patients at a university hospital according to the Waterlow scale. METHODS Data were collected retrospectivity including patients who developed pressure injury during January 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated using Waterlow pressure injury risk assessment tool at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The analysis was performed in 95% confidence interval using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board and the Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS Total 272 cases were included in this study. Highest number of cases belong to age group 50 to 64 years, 83 (30.5%). The majority had stage 2 pressure ulcer, 165 (60.7%). The most frequent location of pressure ulcer was ‘back’, 97 (35.7%). History of undergoing major surgery was statistically significantly associated with higher stage of pressure ulcer (p-value .040). The mean Waterlow pressure injury score for all cases was 27.19 ± 13.143. There is a moderate uphill correlation between neurological deficit score and Waterlow PI score was observed, (Correlation coefficient: .447, p. <.001). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed increasing age is a significant predictive factor for developing higher stages of pressure ulcer (p .046). CONCLUSIONS This study indicated that major surgery, neurological deficit, low hemoglobin, and increasing age are strong predictors for developing higher stages of pressure injury. Therefore, health care contributors should consider these risks when applying a comprehensive pressure injury management plan.