Covid-19 taught us a great deal about respiratory Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) that is relevant for future global biological catastrophic risk (GCBR) events. For example, an equally infectious outbreak of MERS could have caused at least 28.5 million fatalities in the first year of the pandemic.Problems with PPE that arose during Covid-19 include insufficient protection, discomfort, and shortages. Healthcare workers and frontline workers were infected disproportionately often. Causes of discomfort among workers included skin reactions, headaches, and elaborate donning and doffing routines. Worldwide shortages increased this discomfort, as workers improvised with what was at their disposal.One possible solution would be creating strategic stockpiles of reusable, durable, and affordable PPE with high protection and comfort, universal fit, and ease of use. So far, such a product does not exist, but prototypes have been developed, and further innovation could be incentivized. Especially neglected is PPE supply and research for frontline workers not part of the healthcare system. When planning GCBR response, plans must include non-healthcare staff, to keep critical infrastructure from collapsing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.