The incredible utilization of online media brought about significant advantages for mankind in their everyday life. In any case, its utilization was never intended for antagonistic maltreatment by an enormous number of individuals to hurt others, especially spying on their private life. As such, this has seen the issue of identity and social dangers skyrocketing in the recent past. The numerous calls for outright freedom of opinion and the privilege of the individual to talk about everything, away from legitimate punishments, just as obliviousness of numerous individuals of their privacy rights such as their right for protection, depict these acts. With these incidences being on the rise, there is the need for legislative intervention. It is based on these incidences that the study sought to investigate an account of civil liability on the violation of private life in social media. The study pointed out the effects of social media on the idea of the privilege of life security, the privilege of data protection, and the legal legislation on the infringement of protection in terms of the material and moral aspect (Gomez, 2021). The study involved the use of the descriptive and analytical approach whereby keywords were used to search relevant data on the subject of protection of private life and its infringement through social sites. The research inferred that there is confusion in ideas and applications with regard to the idea of private life. Also, because of the relationship between basic liberties and opinion, the civil laws become clear. Furthermore, as the result of the quick advancements in the field of social media, the subsequent specialized complexities of civil liability and controlling its sources are identified. The study suggested for additional discussions on this phenomenon and refreshing the continuous legislations to adapt to the quick and nonstop improvement of the technical revolution. Given what is popular today of the intentional display of individual information increasing via social media sites and the widespread phenomenon of spying the private life of others, this raises the issue of identity and social dangers coming about because of the digital presence of people. Dealing with abuses that influence them by governments, or any other parties, needs numerous directions on the most proficient method to secure them by updating the significant legitimate frameworks.

Compulsory civil liability insurance on car accidents is one of the most important topics, which aims to achieve traffic safety and reduce car accidents. Today, car accidents constitute a great danger to human life as they cause different types of physical and moral damages. This study, however, attempts to highlight the effectiveness of compulsory insurance in providing legal protection for damages resulting from car accidents. Such protection can be achieved through the process of creating legal mechanism to enable injured people to refer to insurance companies. It is quite apparent that nobody can deny the importance of insurance and its influence on people’s lives. Insurance companies nowadays have become an essential cornerstone in the economy of any country. An insurance contract has legal consequences on the parties, which leads to corresponding obligations. These parties are committed to comply with these obligations otherwise, any violation will be treated as per the prescribed legal sanctions.  In conclusion, any research or study on the compulsory insurance system whether in the Emirati law or in Islamic Sharia is highly recommended as part of the attempts to solve and rectify any legal and legitimate problems in this system. An essential objective of the Islamic Sharia is to achieve all fair interests of people. Arab and international legislation consider car insurance compulsory with some exceptions in order to compensate all those affected by a car accident. Arab and other foreign laws as well as the legitimate ones have differed in their choices of car insurance basis. Many legislations in the field of compulsory insurance have limited the right of compensation to body damage. Some other legislations have covered damages of property. Most legislations have not specified the amount of compensation that the insurer is obliged to pay in case of injury, death, or property damages. companies.