Monocytes and macrophages are pivotal in the host response to sepsis, recognizing the infecting microorganism and triggering an inflammatory response. These functions are, at least in part, modulated by the expression of cell surface receptors. We aimed to characterize the monocyte phenotype from septic patients during an ongoing sepsis process and its association with clinical outcomes. Sixty-one septic patients and 31 healthy volunteers (HVs) were enrolled in the study. Samples were obtained from patients at baseline (D0, N = 61), and after 7 (D7, N = 36) and 14 days of therapy (D14, N = 22). Monocytes from septic patients presented decreased expression of CD86, HLA-DR, CD200R, CCR2, CXCR2, and CD163 compared with HV monocytes. In contrast, the PD-1, PD-L1, CD206, CD64, and CD16 expression levels were upregulated in patients. HLA-DR, CD64, PD-1, and PD-L1 expression levels were higher in survivors than in nonsurvivors. Increased CD86, HLA-DR, and CXCR2 expression levels were observed in follow-up samples; in contrast, CD64 and CD16 GMFI decreased over time. In conclusion, monocytes from septic patients show antigen presentation impairment as characterized by decreased HLA-DR and costimulatory CD86 expression and increased PD-1 and PD-L1 expression. On the contrary, increased monocyte inflammatory and phagocytic activities may be inferred by the increased CD16 and CD64 expression. We found conflicting results regarding differentiation toward the M2 phenotype, with increased CD206 expression and decreased CD163 expression on monocytes from septic patients, whereas the subset of nonclassical monocytes was demonstrated by increased CD16.

BackgroundIn developing countries, tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health problem and the leading cause of death among patients with HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus). Until 2001, the tuberculin skin test (TST) was the only available tool for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), but false-negative TST results are frequently reported. Recently, the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) has gained ground because it can detect the IFN-γ secreted by circulating lymphocytes T cells when stimulated by specific TB antigens. However, the role of IGRA in the diagnosis of LTBI in HIV-infected patients has not been well established.MethodsThis cross-sectional study compared the accuracy of TST (performed by the Mantoux method) and IGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube, Cellestis, Carnegie, Australia) on the diagnosis of LTBI among patients with HIV. LTBI is defined by LTBI risk and at least one positive test (TST or IGRA), without clinical evidence of active TB. We also assessed the accuracy of TST and IGRA among HIV patients with high and low risk for LTBI.ResultsAmong 90 HIV patients, 80 met the study criteria for LTBI, fifty-nine (73.7%) patients were TST positive, 21 (26.2%) were negative, whereas 75 patients (93.7%) were IGRA positive, and five (6.2%) were negative. TST showed poor agreement with the diagnosis of LTBI (Kappa: 0.384), while IGRA demonstrated good agreement (Kappa: 0.769). Among 69 patients with high risk and 21 with low risk for LTBI, TST was positive in 48 (69.5%) and 11 (52.4%), while IGRA was positive in 68 (98.5%) and 7 (33.3%) patients, respectively. There were no association between TST and the level of risk (P = 0,191). Conversely, we observed a strong association between the IGRA and risk for LTBI (p < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared to TST, IGRA positivity is consistent with the risk of TB infection and seems to be a better diagnostic tool for LTBI in HIV-infected patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3508-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

These findings revealed a disturbed B-cell homeostasis with unconventional maturation of B lymphocyte memory cells, which can explain the consequent impairment of humoral immunity.