Introduction As survival rates of infants born with esophageal atresia (EA) have improved considerably, research interests are shifting from viability to morbidity and longer-term outcomes. This review aims to identify all parameters studied in recent EA research and determine variability in their reporting, utilization, and definition. Materials and Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review of literature regarding the main EA care process, published between 2015 and 2021, combining the search term “esophageal atresia” with “morbidity,” “mortality,” “survival,” “outcome,” or “complication.” Described outcomes were extracted from included publications, along with study and baseline characteristics. Results From 209 publications that met the inclusion criteria, 731 studied parameters were extracted and categorized into patient characteristics (n = 128), treatment and care process characteristics (n = 338), and outcomes (n = 265). Ninety-two of these were reported in more than 5% of included publications. Most frequently reported characteristics were sex (85%), EA type (74%), and repair type (60%). Most frequently reported outcomes were anastomotic stricture (72%), anastomotic leakage (68%), and mortality (66%). Conclusion This study demonstrates considerable heterogeneity of studied parameters in EA research, emphasizing the need for standardized reporting to compare results of EA research. Additionally, the identified items may help develop an informed, evidence-based consensus on outcome measurement in esophageal atresia research and standardized data collection in registries or clinical audits, thereby enabling benchmarking and comparing care between centers, regions, and countries.

The importance of multidisciplinary long-term follow-up for adults born with esophageal atresia (EA) is increasingly recognized. Hence, a valid, condition-specific instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) becomes imperative. This study aimed to develop and validate such an instrument for adults with EA. The Specific Quality of life in Esophageal atresia Adults (SQEA) questionnaire was developed through focus group-based item generation, pilot testing, item reduction and a multicenter, nationwide field test to evaluate the feasibility, reliability (internal and retest) and validity (structural, construct, criterion and convergent), in compliance with the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments guidelines. After pilot testing (n = 42), items were reduced from 144 to 36 questions. After field testing (n = 447), three items were discarded based on item-response theory results. The final SQEA questionnaire (33 items) forms a unidimensional scale generating an unweighted total score. Feasibility, internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.94) and test–retest agreement (intra-class coefficient 0.92) were good. Construct validity was discriminative for esophageal replacement (P < 0.001), dysphagia (P < 0.001) and airway obstruction (P = 0.029). Criterion validity showed a good correlation with dysphagia (area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.736). SQEA scores correlated well with other validated disease-specific HRQoL scales such as the GIQLI and SGRQ, but poorly with the more generic RAND-36. Overall, this first condition-specific instrument for EA adults showed satisfactory feasibility, reliability and validity. Additionally, it shows discriminative ability to detect disease burden. Therefore, the SQEA questionnaire is both a valid instrument to assess the HRQoL in EA adults and an interesting signaling tool, enabling clinicians to recognize more severely affected patients.

No abstract