Background In adults, oral iron doses increase plasma hepcidin (PHep) for 24 h, but not for 48 h, and there is a circadian increase in PHep over the day. Because high PHep decreases fractional iron absorption (FIA), alternate day iron dosing in the morning may be preferable to consecutive day dosing. Whether these effects occur in infants is uncertain. Objective Using stable iron isotopes in Kenyan infants, we compared FIA from morning and afternoon doses and from consecutive, alternate (every second day) and every third day iron doses. Methods In prospective studies, we measured and compared FIA and the PHep response from 1) meals fortified with a 12-mg iron micronutrient powder given in the morning or afternoon (n = 22); 2) the same given on consecutive or alternate days (n = 21); and 3) a 12-mg iron supplement given on alternate days or every third day (n = 24). Results In total, 65.7% of infants were anemic. In study 1, PHep did not differ between morning and afternoon (P = 0.072), and geometric mean FIA[−SD, +SD](%) did not differ between the morning and afternoon doses [15.9 (8.9, 28.6) and 16.1 (8.7, 29.8), P = 0.877]. In study 2, PHep was increased 24 h after oral iron (P = 0.014), and mean FIA [±SD](%) from the baseline dose [23.3 (10.9)] was greater than that from the consecutive day dose (at 24 h) [20.1 (10.4); P = 0.042] but did not differ from the alternate day dose (at 48 h) [20.9 (13.4); P = 0.145]. In study 3, PHep was not increased 48 and 72 h after oral iron (P = 0.384), and the geometric mean FIA[−SD, +SD](%) from doses given at baseline, alternate days, and every third day did not differ [12.7 (7.3, 21.9), 13.8 (7.8, 24.2), and 14.8 (8.8, 24.8), respectively; P = 0.080]. Conclusions In Kenyan infants given 12 mg oral iron, morning and afternoon doses are comparably absorbed, dosing on consecutive days increases PHep and modestly decreases iron absorption compared with alternate day dosing, and dosing on alternate days or every third day does not increase PHep or decrease absorption. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02989311 and NCT03617575.

Background Whether lactoferrin (Lf) binds iron to facilitate its absorption or to sequester iron from potential enteropathogens remains uncertain. Bovine Lf is added to many infant formulas, but previous studies in infants reported that Lf had no effect on or inhibited iron absorption. The effects of the apo (iron-free) or the holo (iron-loaded) forms of Lf on iron absorption are unclear. Objectives Our objective was to compare iron absorption from a maize-based porridge containing: 1) labeled ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) alone; 2) labeled FeSO4 given with bovine apo-Lf; and 3) intrinsically labeled bovine holo-Lf. Methods In a crossover study, we measured iron absorption in Kenyan infants (n = 25; mean ± SD age 4.2 ± 0.9 months; mean ± SD hemoglobin 109 ± 11 g/L) from maize-based test meals containing: 1) 1.5 mg of iron as 54Fe-labeled FeSO4; 2) 1.42 mg of iron as 58Fe-labeled FeSO4, given with 1.41 g apo-Lf (containing 0.08 mg iron); and 3) 1.41 g holo-Lf carrying 1.5 mg iron as 57Fe. The iron saturation levels of apo- and holo-Lf were 0.56% and 47.26%, respectively primary outcome was fractional iron absorption (FIA), assessed by erythrocyte incorporation of isotopic labels. Results The FIA from the meal containing apo-Lf + FeSO4 (geometric mean, 9.8%; −SD and +SD, 5.4% and 17.5%) was higher than from the meals containing FeSO4 (geometric mean, 6.3%; −SD and +SD, 3.2% and 12.6%; P = 0.002) or holo-Lf (geometric mean, 5.0%; −SD and +SD, 2.8% and 8.9%; P <0.0001). There was no significant difference in FIA when comparing the meals containing holo-Lf versus FeSO4 alone (P = 0.24). Conclusions The amount of iron absorbed from holo-Lf was comparable to that of FeSO4, and the addition of apo-Lf to a test meal containing FeSO4 significantly increased (+56%) iron absorption. These findings suggest that Lf facilitates iron absorption in young infants. Because Lf binds iron with high affinity, it could be a safe way to provide iron to infants in low-income countries, where iron fortificants can adversely affect the gut microbiome and cause diarrhea. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03617575.

Background Long-term feeding of prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) increases iron absorption in African infants, but the underlying mechanism and how long GOS need to be fed to infants to achieve an increase in absorption is uncertain. Objectives In Kenyan infants, we tested whether the addition of GOS to a single test meal would affect iron absorption from a micronutrient powder (MNP) containing ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) and another MNP containing ferrous fumarate (FeFum) and sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA). Methods In a randomized-entry, prospective crossover study, iron deficient (87%) and anemic (70%) Kenyan infants (n  = 23; mean ± SD age, 9.9 ± 2.1 months) consumed 4 stable iron isotope–labeled maize porridge meals fortified with MNPs containing 5 mg iron as FeFum + NaFeEDTA, or FeSO4, either without or with 7.5 g GOS. The primary outcome, fractional iron absorption (FIA), was assessed by erythrocyte incorporation of isotopic labels. Data were analyzed using a 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Results There was no significant interaction between GOS and the iron compounds on FIA, and the addition of GOS did not have a significant effect on FIA. There was a statistically significant difference in FIA between the meals fortified with FeSO4 and with FeFum + NaFeEDTA (P  < 0.001).Given with GOS, FIA from FeSO4 was 40% higher than from FeFum + NaFeEDTA (P  < 0.001); given without GOS, it was 51% higher (P  < 0.01). Conclusions The addition of GOS to a single iron-fortified maize porridge test meal in Kenyan infants did not significantly increase iron absorption, suggesting long-term feeding of GOS may be needed to enhance iron absorption at this age. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02666417.