The efficacy of sorafenib gemcitabine combination therapy is similar to the sorafenib alone treatment. However, frequent dose adjustments due to gemcitabine-related toxicities, delays, and corrective treatments make this combination therapy unsafe in the treatment of advanced HCC.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the commonest non-Hodgkin lymphoma encountered by hematopathologists and oncologists. Management guidelines for DLBCL are developed and published by countries with high income and do not cater for practical challenges faced in resource-constrained settings. This report by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from Pakistan is on behalf of three major national cancer societies: Society of Medical Oncology Pakistan, Pakistan Society of Hematology, and Pakistan Society of Clinical Oncology. The aim is to develop a practical and standardized guideline for managing DLBCL in Pakistan, keeping in view local challenges, which are similar across most of the low- and middle-income countries across the globe. Modified Delphi methodology was used to develop consensus guidelines. Guidelines questions were drafted, and meetings were convened by a steering committee to develop initial recommendations on the basis of local challenges and review of the literature. A consensus panel reviewed the initial draft recommendations and rated the guidelines on a five-point Likert scale; recommendations achieving more than 75% consensus were accepted. Resource grouping initially suggested by Breast Health Global Initiative was applied for resource stratification into basic, limited, and enhanced resource settings. The panel generated consensus ratings for 35 questions of interest and concluded that diagnosis and treatment recommendations in resource-constrained settings need to be based on available resources and management expertise.
298 Background: Sorafenib is considered standard of care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) giving survival benefit of around 4 months. Its combination with gemcitabine, a pyrimidine analogue with limited friendly hepatic profile, may improve results. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib and gemcitabine combination in advanced HCC. Methods: 30 patients of advanced HCC were enrolled in this non-randomized, open-label treatment protocol. Sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily with gemcitabine 1,000mg/m2 intravenous on day 1 and 8 of a 4 week cycle for 4 months. Inclusion criteria: Child class A and B, adequate liver, marrow and renal functions, at least one uni-dimensional measureable lesion, Exclusion criteria: uncontrolled hypertension, serious infections, brain metastasis, bleeding diathesis, pregnant or lactating. National Cancer Institute criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) Version 3.0, and Response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST) was used for assessment. Results: 30 patients: 23 male and 7 female. 24 (80%) Child class A and 6 (20%) class B. All had chronic liver disease. 22 (73.3%) had significantly high alfa-fetoprotein levels (≥ 500). 20 (66.7%) positive for hepatitis C, 4 (13.3%) for hepatitis B. 6 (20%) had no evidence of viral infection. 19 (63.3%) had multifocal lesions and 11 (36.7%) unifocal. 18 (60%) completing 4 cycles of treatment were assessed for response. 2 partial responses (PR) and 8 stable disease (SD) were seen. No complete response (CR) was observed. 8 patients had progressive disease, 4 progressing on interim assessment were taken off protocol. Toxicity: primarily hematological. Gemcitabine related thrombocytopenia being the most common (40%) requiring frequent dose modifications and delays. Sorafenib specific, hand foot skin reaction and anorexia were next most frequent. Conclusions: Sorafenib and gemcitabine combination is not feasible in advanced HCC due to its hematological toxicity especially thrombocytopenia, requiring frequent dose reductions and delays. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.