Aims Previous studies have reported the presence of high‐risk human papillomavirus (HR‐HPV) in a subset of dysplastic oral epithelial lesions. Many cases show a histological spectrum of atypia similar to that seen in non‐human papillomavirus (HPV) severe epithelial dysplasia, but some studies have suggested that HPV status can be inferred on the basis of histological features. We aimed to assess the utility of such histological features and p16 as surrogate markers of HPV infection in a retrospective cohort of 33 cases of severe epithelial dysplasia, with matched clinicopathological data and histological features. Methods and results Tissue sections were assessed for the expression of p16, minichromosome maintenance 2, HPV E4 and HPV L1 by the use of immunohistochemistry. HPV16/18 E6 and E7 expression was assessed by the use of RNA in‐situ hybridisation (RNAScope). In the cohort, 18.2% of cases (6/33) were HR‐HPV‐positive, with no age/gender differences between the HPV‐positive and HPV‐negative groups. HPV E4 and HPV L1 were expressed in surface keratinocytes in four of six (66%) HPV‐positive cases, indicative of productive HPV infection. Lack of p16 expression was predictive of HPV‐negative status, but sensitivity and specificity varied according to the cut‐off. Histologically, the presence of karyorrhectic nuclei and abnormal mitotic figures was higher in HPV‐positive lesions (P < 0.05), but the predictive specificity and sensitivity were suboptimal (sensitivity, 0.75; specificity, 0.52). Conclusions This study demonstrates, for the first time, that a minority of severely dysplastic oral lesions harbour productive, biologically relevant HPV infection. Consideration should be given to the specific assessment of HPV status in severe epithelial dysplasia cases, as both p16 status and the presence of karyorrhectic cells are poor predictive markers of HPV status.
The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancer is increasing and HPV is now implicated in the aetiology of more than 60% of all oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC). In OPSCC, innate immune cells such as neutrophils and macrophages generally correlate with poor prognosis, whilst adaptive immune cells, such as lymphocytes, tend to correlate with improved prognosis. This may, in part, be due to differences in the immune response within the tumour microenvironment leading to the recruitment of specific tumour-associated leukocyte sub-populations. In this study, we aimed to examine if differences exist in the levels of infiltrated leukocyte sub-populations, with particular emphasis on tumour-associated neutrophils (TAN), and to determine the mechanism of chemokine-induced leukocyte recruitment in HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative OPSCC. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that HPV-negative OPSCC contained significantly more neutrophils than HPV-positive tumours, whilst levels of CD68+ macrophages and CD3+ lymphocytes were similar. Using a 3D tissue culture model to represent tumour-stromal interactions, we demonstrated that HPV-negative tumour-stromal co-cultures expressed significantly higher levels of CXCL8, leading to increased neutrophil recruitment compared to their HPV-positive counterparts. HPV-negative OPSCC cells have previously been shown to express higher levels of IL-1 than their HPV-positive counterparts, indicating that this cytokine may be responsible for driving increased chemokine production in the HPV-negative 3D model. Inhibition of IL-1R in the tumour-stromal models using the receptor-specific antagonist, anakinra, dramatically reduced chemokine secretion and significantly impaired neutrophil and monocyte recruitment, suggesting that this tumour-stromal response is mediated by the IL-1/IL-1R axis. Here, we identify a mechanism by which HPV-negative OPSCC may recruit more TAN than HPV-positive OPSCC. Since TAN are associated with poor prognosis in OPSCC, our study identifies potential therapeutic targets aimed at redressing the chemokine imbalance to reduce innate immune cell infiltration with the aim of improving patient outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.