Emerging evidence suggest association of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with the development of many liver abnormalities. The overarching aim of this study was therefore to assess the available evidence on the clinical effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the profiles of liver chemistries and coagulation in COVID-19 diagnosed patients. We considered all study designs including epidemiological and observational that reported liver function test abnormalities in patients confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Medline, Embase databases and Google Scholar as well as relevant reviews were searched to identify appropriate studies from inception to 31st of August 2020. We calculated the pooled mean with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) through a random-effect model meta-analysis. A total of 35 studies with 10,692 participants were considered for the review from which 23 studies with sufficient quantitative data were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean for liver enzymes and coagulation parameters did not significantly change in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and remained within normal range. Notwithstanding potential bias from confounding factors in interpretation of data in this review, findings from the observational studies and case reports suggest that COVID-19 does not appear to have a significant impact on the transaminases or total bilirubin levels of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further controlled studies and larger sample size observational studies are needed with adequate reporting of other liver function parameters are warranted.

Inflammatory bowel diseases are considered immune disorders with a complex genetic architecture involving constantly changing endogenous and exogenous factors. The rapid evolution of genomic technologies and the emergence of newly discovered molecular actors are compelling the research community to reevaluate the knowledge and molecular processes. The human intestinal tract contains intestinal human microbiota consisting of commensal, pathogenic, and symbiotic strains leading to immune responses that can contribute and lead to both systemic and intestinal disorders including IBD. In this review, we attempted to highlight some updates of the new IBD features related to genomics, microbiota, new emerging therapies and some major established IBD risk factors.

Background: Despite the effectiveness of several biological agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), some patients respond better than others. Such discrepancies are often evident early in the treatment course. The aim of this study is to identify the risks and assess the rate of early biological discontinuation (BD) among IBD patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study conducted in Bahrain all IBD patients who were administered biological agents between June 2009 and June 2019 were included. Medical records were reviewed to collect study data and confirm IBD diagnoses. Early discontinuation of biological agents was defined by discontinuation of a biological agent (within 6 months from administration). Montreal classification was used to classify Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC) according to location and extension, respectively. Results: Ineffectiveness was the most common reason for early BD. Early BD was not related to the type of IBD, biological agent used, or to most patient-related factors (such as gender and family history). Patient age at index biological initiation was the only independent significant predictor of early BD ( P = 0.045, adjusted odds ratios (95% CI): 1.06 (1.001–1.116)] even after correction of two significant factors: comorbid diabetes and marked weight loss at diagnosis. Conclusion: The older the IBD patient at the time of biological therapy initiation, the higher the incidence of early BD. Therefore, caution and close follow-up are required for biological therapy among elderly patients to assess effectiveness and adverse drug reactions.

Emerging evidence suggest association of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with development of many liver abnormalities. The overarching aim of this study was therefore to assess the available evidence on the clinical effects of SARS-CoV-2 on liver function laboratory tests and coagulation profile in affected individuals. We considered all study designs including epidemiological and observational that reported liver function test abnormalities in patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Medline, Embase databases and Google Scholar as well as relevant reviews were searched to identify appropriate studies from inception to April 30th, 2020. We calculated pooled mean with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) through a random-effect model meta-analysis. A total of 29 studies with 9991 participants were considered for the review from which 20 studies with sufficient quantitative data were included for the meta-analysis. The pooled mean for liver enzymes and coagulation parameters did not significantly change in patients affected by COVID-19 and remained within normal range. Our systematic review and meta-analysis findings of the available evidence suggest that COVID-19 did not have a significant impact on the liver enzymes or coagulation profile of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Future studies need to adequately report all the liver function parameters with event rates.

BACKGROUND Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) are a very effective treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, brand DAAs are expensive. The licensing of cheaper generic DAAs may address this issue, but there is a lack of clinical studies comparing the efficacy of generic vs brand DAA formulations. AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of generic against brand DAAs for chronic hepatitis C treatment in Bahrain. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study involving 289 patients with chronic HCV infection during 2016 to 2018. There were 149 patients who were treated with brand DAAs, while 140 patients were treated with generic DAAs. Commonly used DAAs were Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin, and Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir ± Ribavirin. SVR at 12 wk post treatment was the main outcome variable. RESULTS Overall, 87 patients (30.1%) had cirrhosis and 68.2% had genotype 1 HCV infection. At 12 wk post treatment, SVR was achieved by 271 (93.8%) of the patients. In patients who were treated with generic medications, 134 (95.7%) achieved SVR at 12 wk post treatment, compared to 137 (91.9%) among those treated with brand medications ( P = 0.19). Having cirrhosis [odds ratio (OR): 9.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.47–35.84] and having HCV genotype 3 (OR: 3.56, 95%CI: 1.03–12.38) were significant independent predictors of not achieving SVR. Alanine transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and total bilirubin levels decreased significantly following therapy with both generic and brand DAAs. CONCLUSION Generic and brand DAAs demonstrate comparable effectiveness in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients. Both are safe and equally effective in improving biochemical markers of hepatic inflammation.