No abstract

Background: Cushing's disease (CD) is associated with increased risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, peptic ulcers, fractures and infections. The prevalence of CD is nearly 40 per million and higher in women than in men. When surgery has failed, is not feasible, or has been refused, pharmacotherapy can be considered a valuable option. Pasireotide is the first medical therapy officially approved for adult patients with CD. We will conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of pasireotide for CD. Methods: Five English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and OVID) and 3 Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) will be searched from their respective inception of databases to December 2020. Two reviewers will select articles, extract data and assess the risk of bias independently. Any disagreement will be resolved by discussion with the third reviewer. Review Manager 5.3 software will be used for data synthesis. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool will be used to evaluate the bias risk. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis will conduct a comprehensive literature search and provide a systematic synthesis of current published data to explore the efficacy and safety of pasireotide for CD. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of pasireotide for CD, and inform our understanding of the value of pasireotide in improving CD clinical signs and symptoms. The conclusions drawn from this study may be beneficial to patients, clinicians, and health-related policy makers. Study registration number: INPLASY2020110070.

Purpose: To take a systematic bibliometric analysis and generate the knowledge mapping of diabetic foot research, basing on big data from Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Methods: Two authors retrieved the WoSCC independently, to obtain publications in field of diabetic foot. CiteSpace was used to detect the co-occurrence relationships of authors, keywords, institutions, and countries/regions, co-citation relationships of authors, references, and journals, and distribution of WoS category. Results: A total of 10,822 documents were included, with 39,541 authors contributed to this field. “Armstrong DG,” “Lavery LA,” and “Lipsky BA” are the top 3 productive authors, and “Armstrong DG,” “Boulton AJM,” and “Lavery LA” were most commonly cited. The United States, England and China are the most productive countries, and Univ Washington, Univ Manchester and Harvard Univ published the largest quantity of articles. “Diabetes Care,” “Diabetic Med,” and “Diabetologia” are the most frequently cited journals, providing the greatest knowledge base. Clustering analysis of keywords co-occurrence map presented the following hotspots: #1 diabetic wound healing, #2 diabetic polyneuropathy, #3 plantar pressure, #4 diabetic foot infection, #5 endovascular treatment, and #6 hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Conclusion: This study performed a global overview of diabetic foot research using bibliometric and visualization methods, which would provide helpful references for researchers focusing on this area to capture the future trend.