Background Options for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease progresses after first-line chemotherapy are limited. This randomized, open-label, international phase 3 study evaluated efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus docetaxel in this patient population after failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Methods Patients were randomized to nivolumab 3 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg per square meter every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results Nivolumab improved overall survival versus docetaxel. Median overall survival was 12.2 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 15.0) for nivolumab (n=292) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 10.7) for docetaxel (n=290) (hazard ratio, 0.73; 96% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; P=0.002). One-year overall survival rates were 51% (95% CI, 45 to 56) for nivolumab and 39% (95% CI, 33 to 45) for docetaxel. Updated efficacy results with additional follow up are available for overall survival only: 18-month overall survival rates were 39% (95% CI, 34 to 45) for nivolumab and 23% (95% CI, 19 to 28) for docetaxel. Response rates were 19% for nivolumab and 12% for docetaxel (P=0.02). Although progression-free survival did not favor nivolumab (2.3 months for nivolumab versus 4.2 months for docetaxel), 1-year progression-free survival was higher for nivolumab (19%) than docetaxel (8%). Nivolumab further improved efficacy across all endpoints at predefined ≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥10% programmed death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor membrane expression levels. Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 10% of nivolumab and 54% of docetaxel-treated patients. Conclusions Compared to docetaxel, nivolumab demonstrated superior overall survival, with PD-L1 expression conferring enhanced efficacy in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The safety profile of nivolumab was favorable versus docetaxel.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which unleash a patient’s own T cells to kill tumors, are revolutionizing cancer treatment. To unravel the genomic determinants of response to this therapy, we used whole-exome sequencing of non–small cell lung cancers treated with pembrolizumab, an antibody targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). In two independent cohorts, higher nonsynonymous mutation burden in tumors was associated with improved objective response, durable clinical benefit, and progression-free survival. Efficacy also correlated with the molecular smoking signature, higher neoantigen burden, and DNA repair pathway mutations; each factor was also associated with mutation burden. In one responder, neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses paralleled tumor regression, suggesting that anti–PD-1 therapy enhances neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity. Our results suggest that the genomic landscape of lung cancers shapes response to anti–PD-1 therapy.

Pembrolizumab had an acceptable side-effect profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PD-L1 expression in at least 50% of tumor cells correlated with improved efficacy of pembrolizumab. (Funded by Merck; KEYNOTE-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01295827.).

Background In patients with melanoma, ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) prolongs overall survival and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) produced durable tumor regressions in a phase 1 trial. Based on their distinct immunologic mechanisms of action and supportive preclinical data, we conducted a phase 1 trial of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients. Methods Patients received nivolumab and ipilimumab every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by nivolumab alone every 3 weeks for 4 doses (concurrent regimen). Combined treatment was subsequently continued every 12 weeks for up to 8 doses. In a sequenced regimen, patients previously treated with ipilimumab received nivolumab every 2 weeks. Results Fifty-three patients received concurrent nivolumab/ipilimumab and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective response rate, for all concurrent-regimen patients was 40% (modified WHO criteria). Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum tolerated dose (1 mg/kg nivolumab + 3 mg/kg ipilimumab), 53% of patients achieved an objective response, all with ≥80% tumor reduction. Grade 3–4 related adverse events occurred in 53% of concurrent-regimen patients, but were qualitatively similar to historical monotherapy experience and were generally reversible. Among sequenced-regimen patients, 18% had grade 3–4 related adverse events and the objective response rate was 20%. Conclusions Concurrent nivolumab/ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and achieved clinical activity that is distinct from published monotherapy data, with rapid and deep tumor regressions in a substantial number of patients.