No abstract

Subcutaneously implanted materials trigger the host's innate immune system, resulting in the foreign body reaction. This reaction consists of protein adsorption on the implant surface, inflammatory cell infiltration, macrophage fusion into foreign body giant cells, fibroblast activation and ultimately fibrous encapsulation. This series of events may affect the function of subcutaneous implants, such as inhibition of drug diffusion from long-acting drug delivery depots and medical device failure. The foreign body reaction is a complex phenomenon and is not yet fully understood; ongoing research studies aim to elucidate the cellular and molecular dynamics involved. Recent studies have revealed information about the specific role of macrophages and their differential activation towards pro- and anti-inflammatory states, as well as species differences in the timing of collagen deposition and fibrosis. Understanding of the diverse processes involved in the foreign body reaction has led to multiple approaches towards its negation. Delivery of tissue response modifiers, such as corticosteroids, NSAIDs, antifibrotic agents, and siRNAs, has been used to prevent or minimize fibrosis. Of these, delivery of dexamethasone throughout the implantation period is the most common method to prevent inflammation and fibrosis. More recent approaches employ surface modifications to minimize protein adsorption to 'ultra-low' levels and reduce fibrosis. However, the diverse nature of the processes involved in the foreign body reaction favor the use of corticosteroids due to their wide spectrum action compared to other approaches. To date, combination approaches, such as hydrophilic coatings that reduce protein adsorption combined with delivery of dexamethasone are the most effective.

The foreign body reaction (FBR), one of the body's defense mechanisms against foreign materials, results in loss of implant biocompatibility. A popular strategy to prevent FBR is the constant release of dexamethasone in the tissue surrounding the implant. However, FBR prevention has not been sufficiently studied in large animal models, which offer a better representation of the human subcutaneous tissue physiology. Accordingly, a long-term strategy to prevent FBR to subcutaneous implants in a large animal model is necessary to translate the existing research for clinical applications. Here, a poly(lactic-co-glycolic) (PLGA) microsphere/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogel composite coating for one-month prevention of FBR in Gottingen minipigs was developed. A modified PLGA microsphere formulation process is presented, that utilizes coprecipitation of dexamethasone and PLGA. Traditional methods result in heterogeneous distribution of large drug crystals in the microsphere matrix, which in turn results in low drug loading since the drug crystal size is close to that of the microspheres. The modified microsphere preparation method showed homogeneous distribution of dexamethasone, which in turn gave rise to increased drug loading, low burst release, and minimal lag phase. Elimination of the lag phase was dictated from previous work that compared FBR between rats and minipigs. The ability of the coatings to improve implant biocompatibility was successfully tested in vivo via histological examination of explanted tissue from the area surrounding the implants. The biocompatible coatings presented here are suitable for miniaturized implantable devices, such as biosensors, that require constant communication with the local microenvironment.

No abstract

No abstract