Background & Aims The drug-induced liver injury network (DILIN) is conducting a prospective study of patients with DILI in the United States. We present characteristics and subgroup analyses from the first 1257 patients enrolled in the study. Methods In an observational longitudinal study, we began collecting data on eligible individuals with suspected DILI in 2004, following them for 6 months or longer. Subjects were evaluated systematically for other etiologies, causes, and severity of DILI. Results Among 1257 enrolled subjects with suspected DILI, the causality was assessed in 1091 patients, and 899 were considered to have definite, highly likely, or probable DILI. Ten percent of patients died or underwent liver transplantation and 17% had chronic liver injury. In the 89 patients (10%) with pre-existing liver disease, DILI appeared to be more severe than in those without (difference not statistically significant; P=.09) and mortality was significantly higher (16% vs 5.2%; P<.001). Azithromycin was the implicated agent in a higher proportion of patients with pre-existing liver disease compared to those without liver disease (6.7% vs. 1.5%, p=0.006). Forty-one cases with latency ≤ 7 days were caused predominantly by antimicrobial agents (71%). Two most common causes for 60 DILI cases with latency >365 days were nitrofurantoin (25%) or minocycline (17%). There were no differences in outcomes of patients with short vs long latency of DILI. Compared to individuals younger than 65 y, individuals 65 y or older (n=149) were more likely to have cholestatic injury, although mortality and rate of liver transplantation did not differ. Nine patients (1%) had concomitant severe skin reactions; implicated agents were lamotrigine, azithromycin, carbamazepine, moxifloxacin, cephalexin, diclofenac, and nitrofurantoin. Four of these patients died. Conclusion Mortality from DILI is significantly higher in individuals with pre-existing liver disease or concomitant severe skin reactions compared to patients without. Further studies are needed to confirm the association between azithromycin and increased DILI in patients with chronic liver disease. Older age and short or long latencies are not associated with DILI mortality.

No abstract

Before the availability of serological markers for hepatitis C, the morphological features of this diagnosis, which represents most non-A, non-B hepatitis, could not be confirmed. We examined biopsy specimens from 50 patients with chronic hepatitis C and 21 patients with autoimmune chronic hepatitis. Each biopsy specimen was graded on 19 different histological features. The results indicated that at the time of biopsy, the average age of patients with chronic hepatitis C was 46 yr vs. 36 yr for autoimmune chronic hepatitis. Cirrhosis was seen more frequently in autoimmune chronic hepatitis (90%) than in hepatitis C (58%). Features more commonly observed in chronic hepatitis C were bile duct damage (91% vs. 40%), bile duct loss (91% vs. 20%), steatosis (72% vs. 19%) and lymphoid cell aggregation (follicles) within portal tracts (49% vs. 10%). Severe lobular necrosis and inflammation (76% vs. 38%), piecemeal necrosis (81% vs. 10%), multinucleated hepatocytes (29% vs. 6%) and broad areas of parenchymal collapse (76% vs. 6%) were seen more often in autoimmune chronic hepatitis. Exclusion of five patients with autoimmune chronic hepatitis who received immunosuppression before biopsy accentuated these differences. In conclusion, morphological criteria, in addition to serological data, may be useful for differentiating chronic hepatitis C from autoimmune chronic hepatitis, which histologically is a more aggressive disease.

No abstract