The AFFIRM Study enrolled 4060 predominantly elderly patients with atrial fibrillation to compare ventricular rate control with rhythm control. The patients in the AFFIRM Study were representative of patients at high risk for complications from atrial fibrillation, which indicates that the results of this large clinical trial will be relevant to patient care.

No abstract

Failure of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm (SR) by standard external direct current cardioversion (DCC) may be due to failure of delivery of enough defibrillating energy rather than to the true refractoriness of AF. Ninety-nine patients with persistent AF (76 male; age 63.7 +/- 0.4 years; weight 113.1 +/- 25.1 kg) who failed standard DCC were included in this report. Under anesthesia, QRS synchronous shocks were delivered across anteroposterior electrodes in the following sequence: (1) a single 360-J shock; (2) another single 360-J shock within 2 minutes; (3) 30 minutes of rest, reinduction of anesthesia and delivery of two simultaneous monophasic 360-J shocks. All patients underwent all three DCC steps. Sixty-six (67%) patients converted to SR following the first dual simultaneous shock. Fourteen patients (14%) required more than one dual shock to achieve SR. This increased the overall success rate of resuming SR to 81%. Except for minor skin burns in three patients there were no procedure related complications. On follow-up at 1 month, 55 (56%) patients were still in SR, whereas 50 (51%) patients maintained SR at 12 months. This was similar to our general DCC population (55% of the 1698 patients were in SR 6 months post-DCC, P = ns). In conclusion, dual external monophasic 360-J DCC is an effective rescue technique for restoration of SR in patients with AF refractory to standard DCC. AF in these patients seems to be as amenable to chronic suppression as AF in the general population of DCC patients.

First isolated in 1943, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ( S. maltophilia ) has historically been of little significance as it was considered a pathogen of low virulence noted to rarely infect immunocompromised hosts. However, over the last 30 years the prevalence of infection caused by the organism has increased significantly. Bacterial endocarditis from S. maltophilia remains exceedingly rare with only a small number of reported cases in the literature. This case involves a 27 year old male with sickle cell anemia with an indwelling right subclavian port who presented to the emergency department with myalgias, fever, and chills. His initial blood cultures grew Gram negative rods later identified as S. maltophilia . Transthoracic echocardiogram showed a mass in the right atrium. Transesophageal echocardiogram revealed a large C-shaped mass with attachment to the tricuspid annulus, mitral valve wall, and port tip in right atrium. The patient underwent sternotomy with removal of the vegetation to prevent embolization. He was treated with intravenous ciprofloxacin and oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole to complete a full 6 weeks of therapy, making a full recovery. This report will further explore the unique presentation of this pathogen along with its epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, risk factors for infection, diagnosis, and appropriate antimicrobial treatment.