Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RTS) is a rare multiple congenital anomaly/intellectual impairment syndrome. Loss of function in CREBBP or EP300 genes has been found in about 50% of patients with RTS. Genotype-phenotype correlations were investigated in 93 patients meeting diagnostic criteria for RTS during 2 international RTS family conferences. Mutation analysis of CREBBP was performed on all 31 coding exons and exon-intron junctions; a subset of patients had FISH analysis for large deletions. A total of 64 different variations were observed in the DNA sequence, and determined to be definitive mutations in 52 patients (56%). Mutations detected included: 10 missense mutations; 36 truncating or splice-site mutations; and 6 large deletions detectable by FISH. Fourteen patients had synonymous changes of unknown significance. The majority of mutations affected the HAT domain of CREBBP or predicted termination of the protein before the HAT region. Extensive phenotypic data were collected on each patient and analyzed to determine correlations with mutation types, that is, truncating, large deletions, single amino acid substitutions, or no CREBBP mutation. All four groups displayed the characteristic facial and thumb dysmorphology. Growth retardation in height and weight was seen more frequently in patients with no CREBBP mutation; seizure disorder was more frequent in those with CREBBP mutations. Degree of mental retardation was similar in all groups, although there was a trend toward lower IQ and autistic features in patients with large deletions. Similarity in phenotype between the groups implies that the several genes involved in causing RTS likely have effects through the same pathway.
Children and adults with Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome have specific medical conditions that occur with greater frequency than the general population. Based on the available information from the literature and clinical experience, recommendations for specific surveillance and interventions are made to guide those clinicians caring for individuals with Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome. This is a first attempt at medical guidelines for individuals with RTS in the United States. On-going research is needed in many areas to guide decisions in medical care and allow for refinement of these medical guidelines.
IMPORTANCEEvidence from studies investigating the association of epidural analgesia use during labor and delivery with risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in offspring is conflicting.OBJECTIVE To assess the association of maternal use of epidural analgesia during labor and delivery with ASD in offspring using a large population-based data set with clinical data on ASD case status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis population-based retrospective cohort study included term singleton children born in British Columbia, Canada, between April 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014. Stillbirths and cesarean deliveries were excluded. Clinical ASD diagnostic data were obtained from the British Columbia Autism Assessment Network and the British Columbia Ministry of Education. All children were followed up until clinical diagnosis of ASD, death, or the study end date of December 31, 2016.EXPOSURES Use of epidural analgesia during labor and delivery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESA clinical diagnosis of ASD made by pediatricians, psychiatrists, and psychologists with specialty training to assess ASD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio of epidural analgesia use and ASD. Models were adjusted for maternal sociodemographics; maternal conditions during pregnancy; labor, delivery, and antenatal care characteristics; infant sex; gestational age; and status of small or large for gestational age. A conditional logistic regression model matching women with 2 births or more and discordance in ASD status of the offspring also was performed. RESULTSOf the 388 254 children included in the cohort (49.8% female; mean gestational age, 39.2 [SD, 1.2] weeks; mean follow-up, 9.05 [SD, 4.3] years), 5192 were diagnosed with ASD (1.34%) and 111 480 (28.7%) were exposed to epidural analgesia. A diagnosis of ASD was made for 1710 children (1.53%) among the 111 480 deliveries exposed to epidural analgesia (94 157 women) vs a diagnosis of ASD in 3482 children (1.26%) among the 276 774 deliveries not exposed to epidural analgesia (192 510 women) (absolute risk difference, 0.28% [95% CI, 0.19%-0.36%]). The unadjusted hazard ratio was 1.32 (95% CI, 1.24-1.40) and the fully adjusted hazard ratio was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.00-1.15). There was no statistically significant association of epidural analgesia use during labor and delivery with ASD in the within-woman matched conditional logistic regression (839/1659 [50.6%] in the exposed group vs 1905/4587 [41.5%] in the unexposed group; fully adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.87-1.30]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this population-based study, maternal epidural analgesia use during labor and delivery was associated with a small increase in the risk of autism spectrum disorder in offspring that met the threshold for statistical significance. However, given the likelihood of residual confounding that may account for the results, these findings do not provide strong supporting evidence for this association.
Breastfeeding to comfort a crying infant is a strong predictor of partial (overall) duration and is rated as a highly effective calming method by parents. These data suggest that parents may benefit from education about normal infant crying patterns and effective methods of infant comforting, including breastfeeding. However, mothers of infants diagnosed with colic are at risk for shortened duration of full breastfeeding. Although the reasons for this are unclear, it may be helpful to specifically address the subject of colic and infant feeding and encourage mothers to fully breastfeed for the recommended 6 months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.