This article discusses the dialogic nature of regulating perspectives on a controversial topic during students’ argumentative writing in remote teaching. The emerging collaborative writing processes mediated by digital technology are importantly changed as responses to physical distancing in education, as demanded by the measures of biosecurity established by the national government to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. Our analysis is framed in a sociocultural perspective, which contributes to our understanding of the concepts related to dialogism, regulation, positionings on a topic, collaborative writing, and digital technology as a tool for dialogic interaction. Our qualitative, idiographic study analyzes the argumentative utterances produced by a dyad of students enrolled in a Textual Production course at a Colombian public university who write a critical commentary over four (4) weeks using Google Docs application. The findings indicate that the participants discuss and negotiate decisions in the group writing situation and that during this dialogic interaction, the ideas are influenced by the thoughts of the other. When they communicate with each other, their discourses regulate their positionings on the social situation that is the subject of the dialogue. It is also possible to identify both the possibilities of the pedagogical mode and its potential limitations for dialogic interaction, which synchronously and asynchronously facilitate or restrict the performance of the joint writing activity. It can be concluded that within the framework of remote teaching, digital technology has become a flexible mode of pedagogical practice that supports dialogic interaction, enables regulation among peers for discussion, negotiation, and positioning on a topic, and facilitates the construction of collective knowledge that emerges in argumentative collaborative writing.
Analizar el efecto de hábitos alimentarios, situación emocional y agencia personal de la actividad física sobre la percepción de dieta y tiempo de actividad física, de universitarios colombianos en condiciones de confinamiento por la COVID-19. Investigación exploratoria de tipo correlacional con alcance explicativo en su nivel de conocimiento. Se aplicó de forma voluntaria un cuestionario en plataforma Google a 389 estudiantes. El modelo estructural explica el 38% de la variabilidad de la percepción de dieta de los estudiantes y 53% de la variabilidad del tiempo dedicado a la AF. Posee bondad de ajuste tanto estadístico, χ² = 84 (47 gl), p = 0,09, como práctico, IBBAN = 96, IBBANN = 99, IAC = 0,99 y RMSEA = 0,02 (0,00, 0,04), por lo que se puede afirmar que este modelo inclusivo tiene el mismo poder de explicación que el modelo saturado, que relaciona todas las variables entre sí. Se evidencia un efecto directo entre las variables hábitos alimenticios, intencionalidad y la percepción que los estudiantes universitarios tienen de su dieta. Así mismo, se observa que, las variables antes mencionadas contribuyen a que aumente el tiempo en minutos de AF.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.