This review addresses important issues of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection, immunity, pathogenesis, and control. Worldwide, PRRS is the most economically important infectious disease of pigs. We highlight the latest information on viral genome structure, pathogenic mechanisms, and host immunity, with a special focus on immune factors that modulate PRRSV infections during the acute and chronic/persistent disease phases. We address genetic control of host resistance and probe effects of PRRSV infection on reproductive traits. A major goal is to identify cellular/viral targets and pathways for designing more effective vaccines and therapeutics. Based on progress in viral reverse genetics, host transcriptomics and genomics, and vaccinology and adjuvant technologies, we have identified new areas for PRRS control and prevention. Finally, we highlight the gaps in our knowledge base and the need for advanced molecular and immune tools to stimulate PRRS research and field applications.

BackgroundAccurate diagnosis is essential for prompt and appropriate treatment of malaria. While rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) offer great potential to improve malaria diagnosis, the sensitivity of RDTs has been reported to be highly variable. One possible factor contributing to variable test performance is the diversity of parasite antigens. This is of particular concern for Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2)-detecting RDTs since PfHRP2 has been reported to be highly variable in isolates of the Asia-Pacific region.MethodsThe pfhrp2 exon 2 fragment from 458 isolates of P. falciparum collected from 38 countries was amplified and sequenced. For a subset of 80 isolates, the exon 2 fragment of histidine-rich protein 3 (pfhrp3) was also amplified and sequenced. DNA sequence and statistical analysis of the variation observed in these genes was conducted. The potential impact of the pfhrp2 variation on RDT detection rates was examined by analysing the relationship between sequence characteristics of this gene and the results of the WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: Round 1 (2008), for 34 PfHRP2-detecting RDTs.ResultsSequence analysis revealed extensive variations in the number and arrangement of various repeats encoded by the genes in parasite populations world-wide. However, no statistically robust correlation between gene structure and RDT detection rate for P. falciparum parasites at 200 parasites per microlitre was identified.ConclusionsThe results suggest that despite extreme sequence variation, diversity of PfHRP2 does not appear to be a major cause of RDT sensitivity variation.

Atovaquone is the major active component of the new antimalarial drug Malarone. Considerable evidence suggests that malaria parasites become resistant to atovaquone quickly if atovaquone is used as a sole agent. The mechanism by which the parasite develops resistance to atovaquone is not yet fully understood. Atovaquone has been shown to inhibit the cytochrome bc 1 (CYT bc 1 ) complex of the electron transport chain of malaria parasites. Here we report point mutations in Plasmodium falciparum CYT b that are associated with atovaquone resistance. Single or double amino acid mutations were detected from parasites that originated from a cloned line and survived various concentrations of atovaquone in vitro. A single amino acid mutation was detected in parasites isolated from a recrudescent patient following atovaquone treatment. These mutations are associated with a 25-to 9,354-fold range reduction in parasite susceptibility to atovaquone. Molecular modeling showed that amino acid mutations associated with atovaquone resistance are clustered around a putative atovaquone-binding site. Mutations in these positions are consistent with a reduced binding affinity of atovaquone for malaria parasite CYT b.The widespread resistance of malaria parasites to standard antimalarial drugs is a serious global health problem. The urgent need for new antimalarial drugs has led to the development of atovaquone (566C80) which, combined with proguanil, has been licensed as Malarone. There is some concern that parasites may develop resistance to Malarone. In one study, 33% of patients treated with atovaquone alone experienced a recrudescence of parasitemia after treatment. These parasites tolerated up to 1,000-fold higher concentrations of atovaquone than did the pretreated parasites (16). Atovaquone-resistant parasites have been readily selected in vitro. Up to 1 in 10 5 parasites became resistant to the drug after having been cultured in the presence of 10 Ϫ8 M atovaquone for 5 weeks (21, 23).Atovaquone has potent blood schizonticidal activity and is also effective against the preerythrocytic (2, 4, 5) and sexual stages (8, 9) of the malaria parasite. It acts by inhibiting mitochondrial electron transport (10) and collapsing mitochondrial membrane potential (25). From these observations and on the basis of its structural similarity to ubiquinol, it has been postulated that atovaquone binds to parasite cytochrome b (CYT b) (31). The inhibitors stigmatellin and 5-n-undecyl-4,7-dioxobenzoxythiazol (UHDBT), which are structurally similar to atovaquone, have been shown to bind at the ubihydroquinone (Q o ) site of CYT b and inhibit electron transport. Single point mutations within the Q o site confer resistance to these inhibitors in a variety of microorganisms (7). Two mutations in close proximity to the Q o site in Pneumocystis carinii are associated with atovaquone prophylaxis failure (33). Atovaquone-resistant Plasmodium yoelii lines have been derived from infected mice treated with suboptimal doses of atovaquone. All resistant lines ...

Background Despite the remarkable activity of artemisinin and its derivatives their monotherapy has been associated with high rates of recrudescence. The temporary growth arrest of ring stage parasites (dormancy) following exposure to artemisinin drugs provides a plausible explanation for this phenomenon. Methods Ring stage parasites of several P. falciparum lines were exposed to different doses of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) alone or in combination with mefloquine (MQ). For each regime the proportion of parasites recovering was determined daily for 20 days. Results Parasite development was abruptly arrested following a single exposure to DHA, with some parasites being dormant for up to 20 days. Approximately 50% of dormant parasites recovered to resume growth within the first 9 days. The overall proportion of parasites recovering was dose dependant with recovery rates ranging from 0.044% to 1.313%. Repeated treatment with DHA, or DHA in combination with MQ, led to a delay in recovery and a ~10 fold reduction in total recovery. Strains with different genetic backgrounds appear to vary in their capacity to recover. Conclusions These results imply that artemisinin-induced growth arrest occurs readily in laboratory treated parasites, and may be a key factor in treatment failure of P. falciparum malaria.