Background: Waon therapy (WT) is the predominant thermal therapy for chronic heart failure in Japan, involving use of a far-infrared dry sauna. As sauna therapy requires certain equipment not readily available in hospitals, we tested the use of whole-body hot pack thermal therapy (HPTT). We compared the magnitude of skin vasodilation post-HPTT with that post-WT. Methods: We recruited 19 healthy men (age [mean ± S.D.]: 26.8 ± 4.6 years) and employed a simple randomized crossover design. The HPTT required subjects to remain in a supine position on a bed for at least 10 min. Hot packs were then applied on the back, lower abdomen, and popliteal regions for 15 min (warming phase). Participants continued bed rest for 30 min (heat-retention phase) after removal of the hot pack. WT was performed as previously described. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), tympanic temperature (TT), and peak and average flow velocity of the right radial artery (PFV and AFV, respectively) and right brachial artery (BA) diameter were measured during HPTT and WT. Results: HR, TT, PFV, and AFV persistently and significantly increased during warming and heat-retention phases of HPTT. In WT, HR and TT significantly increased during warming but decreased and plateaued during heat-retention. BP did not change significantly after either therapy; however, BA was dilated equally in both (HPTT: 3.70 ± 0.57) 4.05 ± 0.59 mm, p ¼ .001; WT: 3.63 ± 0.63) 3.93 ± 0.61 mm, p < .001). Conclusion: HPTT may be equivalent to WT with respect to vasodilation response of the skin.

Some of the difficulties encountered during transbronchial lung biopsy through a flexible bronchofiberscope are due to anatomical reasons, namely the branching angles of some subsegmental bronchi from their mother bronchi are large, and differences in branching angles during respiration may also be large. This makes insertion of forceps difficult. We have sometimes experienced difficulties reaching the target lesion during a transbronchial approach. Which subsegmental bronchi make transbronchial lung biopsy/brushing difficult, and are such difficulties due to anatomical reasons? To answer these questions, we firstly surveyed 10 bronchologists regarding which five subsegmental bronchi they considered to be the most difficult for transbronchial biopsy/brushing. We then measured the branching angles of subsegmental bronchi in 106 cadaver lungs. Finally, in six volunteers, we also measured differences in branching angles of the subsegmental bronchi between the point of forced inspiration and the point of forced expiration on CT images. According to the survey, left B(1+2)c was considered to be the most difficult for insertion by nine doctors, followed by bilateral B6a by seven, right B1a by five, left B3a by five and left B(1+2)a by four. The results of our dissections showed that a branching angle of over 60 masculine was present in more than 10% of specimens in B3a, B6a and B6c in the right lung and in B(1+2)c, B3a, B6a and B6c in the left lung. In addition, three-dimensional reconstructed images revealed that the angles of some subsegmental bronchi changed during respiration. Inter-individual variations were present in most subsegmental bronchi. The direction of movement of each subsegmental bronchus during respiration varied. In addition, maximum degrees of difference in angles between volunteers were sometimes as much as 80 degrees . In conclusion, branching angles of subsegmental bronchi from their mother bronchi are large in B3a, B6a and B6c in the right lung and in B(1+2)c, B3a, B6a and B6c in the left lung. Most of these correspond to those which many bronchologists felt to be difficult for insertion. In addition, changes in the angles of subsegmental bronchi during respiration are likely to partially account for difficulties encountered during transbronchial approaches.

No abstract

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to clarify physical parameters affecting the tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression in patients with prolonged tracheostomy mechanical ventilation. [Methods] Eighteen patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation were included in this study. Expiratory abdominal compression was performed on patients lying in a supine position. The abdomen above the navel was vertically compressed in synchronization with expiration and released with inspiration. We measured the tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression. [Results] The mean tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression was higher than that at rest (430.6 ± 127.1 mL vs. 344.0 ± 94.3 mL). The tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression was correlated with weight, days of ventilator support, dynamic compliance and abdominal expansion. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that weight (β = 0.499), dynamic compliance (β = 0.387), and abdominal expansion (β = 0.365) were factors contributing to the tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression. [Conclusion] Expiratory abdominal compression increased the tidal volume in patients with prolonged tracheostomy mechanical ventilation. The tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression was influenced by each of the pulmonary conditions and the physical characteristics.

[Purpose] This study was designed to compare and clarify the relationship between expiratory rib cage compression and expiratory abdominal compression in patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation, with a focus on tidal volume. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 18 patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation, who had undergone tracheostomy. Each patient received expiratory rib cage compression and expiratory abdominal compression; the order of implementation was randomized. Subjects were positioned in a 30° lateral recumbent position, and a 2-kgf compression was applied. For expiratory rib cage compression, the rib cage was compressed unilaterally; for expiratory abdominal compression, the area directly above the navel was compressed. Tidal volume values were the actual measured values divided by body weight. [Results] Tidal volume values were as follows: at rest, 7.2 ± 1.7 mL/kg; during expiratory rib cage compression, 8.3 ± 2.1 mL/kg; during expiratory abdominal compression, 9.1 ± 2.2 mL/kg. There was a significant difference between the tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression and that at rest. The tidal volume in expiratory rib cage compression was strongly correlated with that in expiratory abdominal compression. [Conclusion] These results indicate that expiratory abdominal compression may be an effective alternative to the manual breathing assist procedure.