Here, tumor-infiltrating CD11b(+) myelomonocytoid cells in murine colon adenocarcinoma-38 and GL261 murine glioma were phenotypically characterized. Over 90% were of the CD11b(+)F4/80(+) monocyte/macrophage lineage. They also had a myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) phenotype, as they suppressed the proliferation of activated splenic CD8(+) T cells and had a CD11b(+)CD11c(+)Gr-1(low)IL-4Ralpha(+) phenotype. In addition, the cells expressed CX(3)CR1 and CCR2 simultaneously, which are the markers of an inflammatory monocyte. The MDSCs expressed CD206, CXCL10, IL-1beta, and TNF-alpha mRNAs. They also simultaneously expressed CXCL10 and CD206 proteins, which are typical, classical (M1) and alternative (M2) macrophage activation markers, respectively. Peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) strongly expressed CD36, CD206, and TGF-beta mRNA, which is characteristic of deactivated monocytes. The MDSCs also secreted TGF-beta, and in vitro culture of MDSCs and PECs with anti-TGF-beta antibody recovered their ability to secrete NO. However, as a result of secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, MDSCs could not be categorized into deactivated monocyte/macrophages. Thus, tumor-infiltrating MDSCs bear pleiotropic characteristics of M1 and M2 monocytes/macrophages. Furthermore, CD206 expression by tumor-infiltrating MDSCs appears to be regulated by an autocrine mechanism that involves TGF-beta.

T cells in mice treated with PC61 was approximately twice that in mice treated with PBS. The numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and natural killer cells were also increased significantly. To test the antimetastatic effects of IL-2 treatment in combination with Treg-cell depletion, human recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) and PC61 were administered to mice implanted with MC38/ mock cells in the spleen, and hepatic metastasis was investigated. The average liver weight in mice treated with rIL-2 plus PC61 was 1.04 ± ± ± ± 0.03 g, less than that in mice treated with rIL-2 (2.04 ± ± ± ± 0.51 g) or PC61 alone (1.81 ± ± ± ± 0.38 g). We conclude that IL-2-induced antitumor immunity is enhanced by Treg-cell depletion and is due to expansion of the tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic CD8 + T-cell population. (Cancer Sci 2007; 98: [416][417][418][419][420][421][422][423]

No abstract

BackgroundDental pulp tissue contains many undifferentiated mesenchymal cells, which retain the ability to differentiate into mature cells. Induced pluripotent stem cells have been developed from various cell sources, including dental pulp-derived stem cells, and evaluated for potential application to regenerative therapy. Dental pulp tissues overexpress CD44, a cell-adhesion factor involved in the induction of mineralization. In this study, we investigated the effects of hyaluronan—a known CD44 ligand—on dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs).MethodsDPSC CD44 expression was analyzed using immunofluorescence staining, flow cytometry, and western blotting. Cell proliferation was evaluated using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Effects of hyaluronan on the cell cycle were analyzed by flow cytometry. Alkaline phosphatase activity was employed as marker of mineralization and measured by fluorometric quantification and western blotting. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2, BMP-4, dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), and dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1 (DMP-1) levels were measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Odontoblastic differentiation and the close cell signaling examination of DPSC differentiation were determined using western blotting.ResultsHyaluronan induced expression of the odontoblastic differentiation markers DMP-1 and DSPP. Moreover, the odontoblastic differentiation induced by hyaluronan was mediated by CD44—but not by Akt, Smad1 or MAPK signaling.ConclusionsOur results indicate that hyaluronan induces odontoblastic differentiation of DPSCs via CD44. This suggests that hyaluronan plays a crucial role in the induction of odontoblastic differentiation from DPSCs. Our findings may aid the development of new, inexpensive, and effective conservative treatments for dental pulp repair.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-016-0399-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.