PurposeCertain oral surgical procedures can injure neurovascular canals and foramens in the mandible. Hence, before performing surgical procedures, it is important to assess the distribution of the bifid mandibular canal (BMC), accessory mental foramen (AMF), medial lingual canal (MLC), lateral lingual canal (LLC), buccal foramen (BF), and lingual alveolar canal (LAC). This study aimed to assess the distribution of different types of canals and foramens. Furthermore, we investigated the limitations associated with finding these structures in panoramic images.MethodsFifty-eight patients who had undergone panoramic radiography and computed tomography (CT) scans at our hospital were randomly selected for this study. Imaging data obtained from these patients were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsWe found that the occurrence of BMC was 60.3%, AMF was 6.9%, MLC was 98.2%, LLC was 75.9%, BF was 43.1%, and LAC was 98.3%. Edge-contrasted inverted panoramic images revealed BMCs in 21.7% and AMFs in 25%; however, most of these canals could not be detected. In the panoramic images, the average diameter of the BMC was significantly different between the detected group and not detected group. The number of canals and foramens in the anterior region to the molar region decreased on the buccal and lingual sides, and most BMCs were in the retromolar to the ramus region.ConclusionOur results indicated different distributions and occurrence rates of each type of neurovascular canal and foramens.
The condyle is the most common site of mandibular fracture. In the present study, an attempt was made to utilize three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images to evaluate mandibular condyle fractures and identify prognostic indicators of malocclusion after closed treatment. Accurate morphometric measurements were performed using 3D-CT images obtained before trauma, after trauma, and after healing. Morphometry revealed significant differences in loss of ramus height (LRH) and lateral movement length in patients with malocclusion, and significant LRH differences in patients with other maxillomandibular fractures after healing, or in those with dislocation-displacement. The present method of 3D-CT image analysis appears useful for evaluation of condylar fractures.
Although closed reduction is common for condylar fractures, bone fragments may heal improperly. This study aimed to investigate the healing morphology of unilateral condylar fractures. We retrospectively investigated 70 patients with unilateral condylar fractures. Clinico-statistical analyses were performed on the whole-condylar fracture, closed reduction, and observation/functional therapy groups. Among these patients, 52 patients aged older than 16 years underwent closed reduction. The extent of maximum mouth opening, the incidence of malocclusion, and the relationship between healing morphology and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen classification or trismus were analyzed in the closed reduction group. There were significant differences in age (P = 0.008) and sex (P = 0.025) between the closed reduction and observation/functional therapy groups. However, there were no significant differences in trauma etiologies and concomitant fractures between the 2 groups. The average maximum mouth opening extent for unilateral fractures after closed reduction was 42.6 ± 6.1 mm. Only 1 case (2.1%) of post-treatment malocclusion was observed. In all the MacLennan classification of deviation or more, regardless of the classification, upper fractures (head and upper neck) tended to heal through a spherical (P < 0.001) morphology, whereas lower fractures (lower neck and subcondylar) tended to heal through an L-shaped and lateral fusion (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of trismus between the healing morphology of unchanged type and others (P = 0.690). Our results elucidated the etiology, dysfunction, and healing morphology classification of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures treated with closed reduction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.