No abstract

No abstract

The DUSP22-IRF4 gene rearrangement results in downregulation of DUSP22, a presumed tumor suppressor in T-cell lymphomagenesis. It has been described in some cases of primary cutaneous and systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, lymphomatoid papulosis, and transformed mycosis fungoides. Here we describe two patients with clinical lesions resembling patch/plaque mycosis fungoides that did not meet WHO criteria for large-cell transformation on histopathology yet showed a DUSP22 translocation. One patient who had a history of systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma with DUSP22 translocation presented with cutaneous involvement by his systemic lymphoma along with lymphomatoid papulosis and mycosis-fungoides-like lesions, all showing an identical immunophenotype and T-cell clone. These cases expand the spectrum of DUSP22-rearranged lymphomas to include mycosisfungoides-like presentations without large-cell transformation.

Background Patient satisfaction is a proxy for quality clinical care. Understanding the factors that drive patient satisfaction scores is important because they are publicly reported, may be used in determining hospital and physician compensation, and may allow patients to preselect physicians. Objective This single-center survey study of adult patients at the Michigan Medicine outpatient dermatology clinics aimed to investigate how patients respond differently to theoretical dermatologic scenarios with varying dermatologist gender. Methods Each questionnaire contained one of four clinical scenarios illustrating overall positive or negative encounters with a male or female dermatologist, followed by questions derived from the Press Ganey survey to assess patient satisfaction. Results A total of 452 completed questionnaires were collected. There were statistically significant differences in overall patient satisfaction scores between positive versus negative female and positive versus negative male dermatologists, but there were no differences in scores between positive female and positive male dermatologists or between negative female and negative male dermatologists. There were also no differences in overall scores after controlling for patient demographic characteristics or patient–dermatologist gender concordance. Conclusion Previous studies have suggested that male physicians receive better patient satisfaction scores compared to female physicians. However, our study found that, in response to hypothetical scenarios of positive and negative dermatology encounters, dermatologist gender did not affect any domain of patient satisfaction scores. Limitations include the use of hypothetical patient–dermatologist encounters and possible lack of generalizability because the study was conducted at one academic center in southeast Michigan with a predominantly Caucasian patient population.

No abstract