Abstract. Coastal facilities such as nuclear power plants (NPPs) have to be designed to withstand extreme weather conditions and must, in particular, be protected against coastal floods because it is the most important source of coastal lowlands inundations. Indeed, considering the combination of tide and extreme storm surges (SSs) is a key issue in the evaluation of the risk associated to coastal flooding hazard. Tide and extreme SSs are considered as independent. While there are several approaches to analyze and characterize coastal flooding hazard with either extreme SSs or sea levels, only few studies propose and compare several approaches combining the tide density with the SS variable. Thus this study aims to develop a method for modelling dependence and coincidence of SSs and high tide. In this work, we have used existing methods for tide and SS combination and tried to improve the results by proposing a new alternative approach while showing the limitations and advantages of each method. The city of Le Havre in France was used as a case study. Overall, the example has shown that the return levels estimates using different combinations are quite different. It has also been suggested that the questions of coincidence and dependency are essential for a combined tide and SS hazard analysis.
Many coastal urban areas and many coastal facilities must be protected against pluvial and marine floods, as their location near the sea is necessary. As part of the development of a Probabilistic Flood Hazard Approach (PFHA), several flood phenomena have to be modelled at the same time (or with an offset time) to estimate the contribution of each one. Modelling the combination and the dependence of several flooding sources is a key issue in the context of a PFHA. As coastal zones in France are densely populated, marine flooding represents a natural hazard threatening the coastal populations and facilities in several areas along the shore. Indeed, marine flooding is the most important source of coastal lowlands inundations. It is mainly generated by storm action that makes sea level rise above the tide. Furthermore, when combined with rainfall, coastal flooding can be more consequent. While there are several approaches to analyse and characterize marine flooding haz ard with either extreme sea levels or intense rainfall, only few studies combine these two phenomena in a PFHA framework. Thus this study aims to develop a method for the analy sis of a combined action of rainfall and sea level. This analysis is performed on the city of Le Havre, a French urban city on the English Channel coast, as a case study. In this work, we have used deterministic materials for rainfall and sea level modelling and proposed a new approach for estimating the probabilities of flooding.
Abstract. Coastal facilities such as nuclear power plants (NPPs) have to be
designed to withstand extreme weather conditions and must, in particular, be
protected against coastal floods because it is the most important source of
coastal lowland inundations. Indeed, considering the combination of tide
and extreme storm surges (SSs) is a key issue in the evaluation of the risk
associated with coastal flooding hazard. Most existing studies are generally
based on the assumption that high tides and extreme SSs are
independent. While there are several approaches to analyze and characterize
coastal flooding hazard with either extreme SSs or sea levels, only few
studies propose and compare several approaches combining the tide density
with the SS variable. Thus this study aims to develop a method for modeling
dependence and coincidence of SSs and high tide. In this work, we have used
existing methods for tide and SS combination and tried to improve the
results by proposing a new alternative approach while showing the
limitations and advantages of each method. Indeed, in order to estimate
extreme sea levels, the classic joint probability method (JPM) is used by
making use of a convolution between tide and the skew storm surge (SSS).
Another statistical indirect analysis using the maximum instantaneous storm
surge (MSS) is proposed in this paper as an alternative to the first method
with the SSS variable. A direct frequency analysis using the extreme total
sea level is also used as a reference method. The question we are trying to
answer in this paper is then the coincidence and dependency essential for a
combined tide and SS hazard analysis. The results brought to light a bias in
the MSS-based procedure compared to the direct statistics on sea levels, and this
bias is more important for high return periods. It was also concluded that
an appropriate coincidence probability concept, considering the dependence
structure between SSs, is needed for a better assessment of the risk using
the MSS. The city of Le Havre in France was used as a case study. Overall,
the example has shown that the return level (RL) estimates using the MSS
variable are quite different from those obtained with the method using
the SSSs, with acceptable uncertainty. Furthermore, the shape parameter is
negative from all the methods with a much heavier tail when the SSS and the
extreme sea levels (ESLs) are used as variables of interest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.