Objectives: Preconception counseling, maternal health-related habits, diet, folic acid consumption, substances abuse, may all impact the outcome of pregnancy. The aim of this study was to compare the planning and preparation for pregnancy among pregnant women with and without infertility. Material and methods:A survey of health behaviors prior to and during pregnancy that could affect pregnancy outcomes, including laboratory tests performed, stimulant usage, initiation of prenatal care, and folic acid intake, was conducted among 400 pregnant women. The study group included 121 women (30.25%) diagnosed with prior infertility, while the control group included 279 women (69.74%) who did not report any problems conceiving.Results: All patients (100%) from the study group and 70,97% from the control group planned their pregnancy(p < 0.0001). Patients in the study group performed significantly more laboratory tests prior to pregnancy, including: complete blood count, urine analysis, fasting blood glucose concentration, testing for toxoplasmosis, and Pap smear, compared with the control group (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between groups regarding the knowledge of when and why folic acid supplementation is required (p > 0.05). Conclusions:Effective education of women, regarding pregnancy planning and behaviours, that may impact pregnancy outcome is still a serious challange to public health in Poland. Our study indicates that reaching general population with the education is most important to achieve best results in preconceptional care.
(1) Background: there is a steady increase in the number of procedures performed via minimally invasive surgery, which have many benefits, but post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and significant pain are still a common problem (2) Methods: 300 infertile women (18–40 years old) undergoing minimal invasive surgery. Interventions: laparoscopy and hysteroscopy performing, evaluation of postoperative symptoms, serotonin concentrations assessment, identify genetic polymorphisms. (3) Results: serotonin concentrations were significantly lower among women who required opioids (p = 0.006). The presence of the GG genotype in the rs6318 polymorphism of the 5HTR2C gene had a protective effect on PONV (OR = 0.503; C.I. = [0.300–0.841]; p = 0.008), when the GG variant of the rs11214763 polymorphism of the 5HTR3B gene, when the risk of PONV was 1.65-fold higher (OR = 1.652; C.I. = [1.003–2.723]; p = 0.048). Pain intensity was significantly higher among women with GG genotype of the rs6296 polymorphism of the 5HTR1B gene (OR = 1.660; C.I. = [1.052–2.622]; p = 0.029).; (4) Conclusions: the evaluation of serotonin concentration predicts requirement for opioid pain relief medication. The polymorphisms of the serotonin receptors affect the intensity of postoperative complaints.
Background: Hysteroscopy is currently the gold-standard procedure in the evaluation of the uterine cavity and treatment of intrauterine lesions as it is minimally invasive and has high diagnostic efficiency. According to previous observations, many patients are afraid of minimally invasive procedures performed under general anesthesia. They are also afraid of procedures that, according to them, may be associated with pain. To address this issue, in this study, the levels of stress and anxiety, and biochemical parameters indicating the hormonal response in terms of the stress response in hysteroscopic procedures under local anesthesia were compared with those of traditional surgical procedures and uterine cavity curettage procedures under general, short-term anesthesia. Methods: This study included 184 participants: 153 women undergoing diagnostic or operative mini-hysteroscopy procedures with the use of a hysteroscope of a reduced diameter under local, paracervical anesthesia without the participation of an anesthesiologist, and 31 women undergoing hysteroscopy or uterine cavity curettage under general, intravenous, short-term anesthesia with the participation of an anesthesiologist. To determine cortisol and prolactin levels using electrochemiluminescence, blood was collected from the patients on the day of admission to the hospital, i.e., the day of surgery, in the morning, while fasting. An original survey questionnaire, the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used as research tools. The questionnaires were completed by the patients themselves 60 min before the surgery. Results: APAIS: no significant differences in anxiety and information demand scores were observed between the study groups. Anxiety before surgery was significantly higher than that before anesthesia in both groups. Similarly, information demand for surgery was significantly higher than that for anesthesia in both groups. VAS: no significant differences in anxiety and stress scores were observed between the groups. No significant differences in prolactin and cortisol levels were observed between the groups. Conclusions: It can be concluded that it is necessary to apply the interventions that reduce the anxiety of the patients and inform patients about the planned course of the procedure, since higher levels of anxiety before the procedure result in a significant increase in procedure duration, which in turn can increase the pain experienced by the patients.
Objectives: A review to assess the safety, efficacy, COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and awareness in pregnant women. Machanism: Pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 are characterized by more frequent hospitalization in intensive care units and are at three times higher risk of preterm; their newborns more often need invasive ventilation. Vaccination is the most effective preventive measures against SARS-CoV-2, but there are still questions about safety and immune response. Pregnant women were not included in study groups during phase III clinical trials. Findings in Brief: Vaccination during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of obstetric or neonatal complications; scientific communities recommend vaccination for pregnant women, those planning for pregnancy and those who are breastfeeding. Unfortunately, knowledge regarding COVID-19 vaccination and willingness to take vaccine during pregnancy is low. Conclusions: General practitioners and obstetricians have a large role in increasing public awareness of COVID-19 vaccination. No evidence of teratogenicity of the vaccine has been found.
Objective: Hysteroscopic procedures are minimally invasive procedures that enable to assess the uterine cavity (diagnostic hysteroscopy) and to treat intrauterine lesions (operative hysteroscopy). In recent years have witnessed a steady increase in the number of procedures performed via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) including hysteroscopies. Most outpatient hysteroscopies are painless, without complications, and not only allow to diagnose but also treat several intrauterine pathologies. Vaginoscopy hysteroscopy without using speculum, tenaculum and other potentially painful instrumentation should become the default method for outpatient hysteroscopy. This 'no-touch' technique is faster in contrary to standard hysteroscopy and is associated with less pain. Mechanism: A wide range of feasible procedures, constantly improved endoscopic equipment and tools, improving the technical conditions of the procedure, as well as short hospitalization time and a quick recovery period, are just some of the benefits of hysteroscopic surgeries. Findings in Brief: Performing hysteroscopy in an outpatient setting without general anesthesia addictionally reduces treatment cost and avoid of possible complications of general anesthesia. Conclusions: Performing hysteroscopy in an outpatient setting without general anesthesia (with the patient's consciousness preserved during the surgery) reduces treatment cost and shortens the duration of hospitalization and convalescence, thus increasing patient satisfaction with care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.