Purpose of Review
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a multifactorial, heritable syndrome characterized by dysregulated glucose homeostasis that results from impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance. Genetic association studies have successfully identified hundreds of T2D risk loci implicating many genes in disease pathogenesis. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent T2D genetic studies from the past 3 years with particular focus on the effects of sample size and ancestral diversity on genetic discovery as well as discuss recent work on the use and limitations of genetic risk scores (GRS) for T2D risk prediction.
Recent Findings
Recent large-scale, multi-ancestry genetic studies of T2D have identified over 500 novel risk loci. The genetic variants (i.e., single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) marking these novel loci in general have smaller effect sizes than previously discovered loci. Inclusion of samples from diverse ancestral backgrounds shows a few ancestry specific loci marked by common variants, but overall, the majority of loci discovered are common across ancestries. Inclusion of common variant GRS, even with hundreds of loci, does not substantially increase T2D risk prediction over standard clinical risk factors such as age and family history.
Summary
Common variant association studies of T2D have now identified over 700 T2D risk loci, half of which have been discovered in the past 3 years. These recent studies demonstrate that inclusion of ancestrally diverse samples can enhance locus discovery and improve accuracy of GRS for T2D risk prediction. GRS based on common variants, however, only minimally enhances risk prediction over standard clinical risk factors.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a continuous progression of pathophysiologic stages that is challenging to diagnose due to its inherent heterogeneity and poor standardization across a wide variety of diagnostic measures. NAFLD is heritable, and several loci have been robustly associated with various stages of disease. In the past few years, larger genetic association studies using new methodology have identified novel genes associated with NAFLD, some of which have shown therapeutic promise. This mini-review provides an overview of the heterogeneity in NAFLD phenotypes and diagnostic methods, discusses genetic associations in relation to the specific stages for which they were identified, and offers a perspective on the design of future genetic mapping studies to accelerate therapeutic target identification.
Loss-of-function mutations in Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1A (HNF1A) are known to cause rare forms of diabetes and alter hepatic physiology through unclear mechanisms. In the general population, 1:100 individuals carry a rare protein-coding variant in HNF1A, most of unknown functional consequence. To characterize the full allelic series, we performed deep mutational scanning of 11,970 protein-coding HNF1A variants in human hepatocytes and clinical correlation with 553,246 exome-sequenced individuals. Surprisingly, we found ~1:5 rare protein-coding HNF1A variants found in the general population cause molecular gain-of-function (GOF), increasing the transcriptional activity of HNF1A by up to 50%. GOF in HNF1A conferred protection from type 2 diabetes (T2D) (OR=0.60, p=8.4 x 10-7), but not against coronary artery disease. Independently of T2D, increased hepatic expression of HNF1A promoted a pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic serum profile mediated in part by enhanced transcription of risk genes including PCSK9. In summary, ~1:300 individuals carry a GOF variant in HNF1A that protects carriers from diabetes but enhances hepatic secretion of metabolic disease risk factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.