Annual pasture legume species can vary more than 3-fold in their critical external phosphorus (P) requirement (i.e. P required for 90% of maximum yield). In this work we investigated the link between root morphology, P acquisition and critical external P requirement among pasture species. The root morphology acclimation of five annual pasture legumes and one grass species to low soil P availability was assessed in a controlled-environment study. The critical external P requirement of the species was low (Dactylis glomerata L., Ornithopus compressus L., Ornithopus sativus Brot.), intermediate (Biserrula pelecinus L., Trifolium hirtum All.) or high (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Root hair cylinder volumes (a function of root length, root hair length and average root diameter) were estimated in order to assess soil exploration and its impact on P uptake. Most species increased soil exploration in response to rates of P supply near or below their critical external P requirement. The legumes differed in how they achieved their maximum root hair cylinder volume. The main variables were high root length density, long root hairs and/or high specific root length. However, total P uptake per unit surface area of the root hair cylinder was similar for all species at rates of P supply below critical P. Species that maximised soil exploration by root morphology acclimation were able to prolong access to P in moderately P-deficient soil. However, among the species studied, it was those with an intrinsic capacity for a high root-hair-cylinder surface area (i.e. long roots and long root hairs) that achieved the lowest critical P requirement.
Background and Aims: This work aimed to quantify the critical external requirement for phosphorus (P) (i.e. external P concentration required for 90% of maximum yield) for a number of temperate legume species and understand differences in dry matter allocation, P distribution and P acquisition efficiency among these species. Methods: Shoot and root growth of five legume and one grass species was assessed in response to six rates of P mixed into the top 45 mm of soil in a pot experiment. Dactylis glomerata and Trifolium subterraneum were used as benchmark species; they are commonly grown together in mixed temperate pastures and have low and high critical external requirements for P, respectively. Growth was compared with four potential alternative legume species: Ornithopus compressus, Ornithopus sativus, Biserrula pelecinus and Trifolium hirtum, that have root morphologies better suited to soil exploration and nutrient acquisition than that of Trifolium subterraneum. Results: Dactylis glomerata, Ornithopus compressus and Ornithopus sativus had maximum yields equal to or greater than Trifolium subterraneum but achieved this at rates of P less than half that of Trifolium subterraneum. Biserrula pelecinus and Trifolium hirtum had critical P requirements between that of Trifolium subterraneum and the Ornithopus species, but also had lower yields. Root dry matter of Dactylis glomerata and the Ornithopus species in the fertilised soil layer was only marginally changed in response to low P supply. In contrast, Trifolium subterraneum, Trifolium hirtum and to a lesser extent Biserrula pelecinus markedly increased root dry matter allocation to this soil layer. Species with lower critical P requirements were able to take up more P per unit root dry mass than those with higher critical P requirements, particularly at lower levels of P addition. Conclusions: The high P acquisition efficiencies of the Ornithopus species and Dactylis glomerata were likely to have contributed to their low critical external P requirements. It was surmised that differences in root morphology traits underpin the differences in acclimation to low P stress and P acquisition efficiency among the species.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.