Liquid composite molding (LCM) techniques are innovative manufacturing processes for processing fiber reinforced polymer parts used e.g. for aerospace structures. Thereby the reinforcing material is placed in a mold and infiltrated with a low viscosity polymer matrix. Increasing production rates as well as part complexity lead to high production risks such as air inclusions or incomplete mold filling. Numerical mold filling simulations are promising tools enabling the composite manufacturing engineer to detect dry spots in the mold and find the optimal positions of the resin entry and ventilation system at an early process development stage. Today, different numerical models and software packages are available for modeling the flow through the reinforcing structure for visualization of the flow behavior. The goal of this study is the systematic comparison of two different software packages, namely PAM‐RTM® and OpenFOAM. Both software tools are operated as they are commonly foreseen. Real world experiments under real process conditions are the basis for the assessment of the numerical predictions. The resin transfer molding (RTM) experiments are executed in a tool with a transparent upper mold half in order to see the flow front advancement. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:2782–2793, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers