Background While early identification of neonatal illness can impact neonatal mortality rates and reduce the burden of treatment, identifying subtle clinical signs and symptoms of possible severe illness is especially challenging in neonates. The World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund developed the Integrated Management of Neonatal Childhood Illness guidelines, an evidence-based tool highlighting seven danger signs to assess neonatal health. Currently, many mothers in low-resource settings rely on home visits from community health workers (CHWs) to determine if their baby is sick. However, CHWs visit infrequently, and illness is often detected too late to impact survival. Thus, delays in illness identification pose a significant barrier to providing expedient and effective care. Neonatal Monitoring (NeMo), a novel neonatal assessment tool, seeks to increase the frequency of neonatal screening by task-shifting identification of neonatal danger signs from CHWs to mothers. Objective This study aimed to explore the usability and acceptability of the NeMo system among target users and volunteer CHWs by assessing ease of use and learnability. Methods Simulated device use and semistructured interviews were conducted with 32 women in the Iganga-Mayuge districts in eastern Uganda to evaluate the usability of the NeMo system, which involves a smartphone app paired with a low cost, wearable band to aid in identification of neonatal illness. Two versions of the app were evaluated using a mixed methods approach, and version II of the app contained modifications based on observations of the first cohort’s use of the system. During the posed scenario simulations, participants were offered limited guidance from the study team in order to probe the intuitiveness of the NeMo system. The ability to complete a set of tasks with the system was tested and recorded for each participant and closed- and open-ended questions were used to elicit user feedback. Additionally, focus groups with 12 CHWs were conducted to lend additional context and insight to the usability and feasibility assessment. Results A total of 13/22 subjects (59%) using app version I and 9/10 subjects (90%) using app version II were able to use the phone and app with no difficulty, despite varying levels of smartphone experience. Following modifications to the app’s audio instructions in version II, participants’ ability to accurately answer qualitative questions concerning neonatal danger signs improved by at least 200% for each qualitative danger sign. All participants agreed they would trust and use the NeMo system to assess the health of their babies. Furthermore, CHWs emphasized the importance of community sensitization towards the system to encourage its adoption and regular use, as well as the decision to seek care based on its recommendations. Conclusions The NeMo system is an intuitive platform for neonatal assessment in a home setting and was found to be acceptable to women in rural Uganda.

There is an impetus for the timely diagnosis of dementia to enable optimal management of patients, carers and government resources. This is of growing importance in the setting of a rising prevalence of dementia in an aging population. The Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia advocate referral to comprehensive memory services for dementia diagnosis, but in practice many patients may be diagnosed in other settings. The aim of the present study was to obtain evidence of the roles, effectiveness, limitations and accessibility of current settings and services available for dementia diagnosis in Australia. A literature review was performed by searching Ovid MEDLINE using the terms 'dementia' AND 'diagnosis OR detection'. In addition, articles from pertinent sources, such as Australian government reports and relevant websites (e.g. Dementia Australia) were included in the review. Literature was found for dementia diagnosis across general practice, hospitals, memory clinics, specialists, community, care institutions and new models. General practitioners are patients' preferred health professionals when dealing with dementia, but gaps in symptom recognition and initiation of cognitive testing lead to underdiagnosis. Hospitals are opportunistic places for dementia screening, but time constraints and acute medical issues hinder efficient dementia diagnosis. Memory clinics offer access to multidisciplinary skills, demonstrate earlier dementia diagnosis and potential cost-effectiveness, but are disadvantaged by organisational complexities. Specialists have increased confidence in diagnosing dementia than generalists, but drawbacks include long wait lists. Aged care assessment teams (ACAT) are a potential service for dementia diagnosis in the community. A multidisciplinary model for dementia diagnosis in care institutions is potentially beneficial, but is time and cost intensive. New models with technology allow dementia diagnosis in rural regions. Memory clinics are most effective for formal dementia diagnosis, but healthcare professionals in other settings play vital roles in recognising patients with dementia and initiating investigations and referrals to appropriate services. Delays in dementia diagnosis are common, and it is unclear where majority of patients receive a diagnosis of dementia in Australia. While the Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia advocate referrals to services such as memory clinics for comprehensive assessment and diagnosis of dementia, such services may have limited capacity and may not be readily accessible to all. This paper presents an overview of the various settings and services available for dementia diagnosis in Australia including evidence of the roles, accessibility, effectiveness and limitations of each setting. This concerns a disease that is highly prevalent and escalating, and highlights the roles for practitioners in various settings including general practices, acute hospitals, speci...

S t a t e o f t h e W o r l d ' s M o t h e r s 2 0 0 1 a r e p o r t b y S a v e t h e C h i l d r e nSave the Children is a leading nonprofit childassistance organization working in more than 45 countries worldwide, including the United States. Our mission is to make lasting, positive change in the lives of children in need.

Background: Australian guidelines advocate referral to comprehensive memory services for dementia diagnosis, but many patients may be diagnosed elsewhere.Aims: To determine common settings for dementia diagnosis in Australia and to compare patient and carer experience between settings. Methods:Exploratory cross-sectional study of patients with dementia admitted to a Melbourne sub-acute hospital. Patients who had capacity to participate were included; carers were recruited for patients without capacity. Participants completed an interviewer-administered survey which asked them to recall the diagnostic setting, discussions about diagnosis and management (clinical care) and overall experience of diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were applied and open-ended questions were analysed using inductive and deductive coding approaches.Results: From 81 eligible participants, 74 consented to participate (one patient, 74 carers).Participants reported dementia diagnosis occurred a median of 24 months before interview, in the following settings: hospitals (31.3%), private specialist clinics (29.7%), memory clinics (14.9%), general practice (13.5%), community health services (9.5%) and residential care (1.4%). Recall of discussions about dementia-modulating medications was higher in participants diagnosed in memory clinics and private specialist clinics (70%) compared to other settings (15%) (P < 0.001). Discussion about living circumstances was highest in hospitals (87% vs 40%) (P < 0.001). One third of participants reported dissatisfaction with their experience. Reported satisfaction was highest for memory clinics. Conclusion:Results suggest majority of people with dementia are diagnosed outside memory services. Significant variability exists in experiences between services, with a high proportion of participants expressing dissatisfaction with their experience with dementia diagnosis. Strategies to standardise diagnosis of dementia, measure and improve quality of care across all settings are required.

Physicians have a duty of care to act in a patient’s best interest; however, a patient’s goals of care may differ throughout different stages of their disease and at end of life.This case study aims to illustrate a physician’s role in guiding patient management at different stages in a patient with a terminal disease, while adopting a person-centred approach. The case focuses on a patient with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) and highlights some patient-related factors for consideration in management of MBO. It also discusses the ethical considerations in the physician–patient relationship, particularly the aspect of giving information regarding treatment options and addresses the concept of “individualized” goals of care. Person-centred care is dynamic and a clinician may need to adjust their role in providing person-centred care according to different stages of a patient’s disease.