Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is an uncommon and mostly congenital cardiac anomaly which predominantly affects Asian males [1]. Congenital SVA is caused by deficiency of normal elastic tissue between aortic media and the annulus fibrosus (abnormal bulbus cordis development) [2]. Ventricular septal defect (VSD), aortic regurgitation (AR), and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are frequent concomitant lesions in this SVA type. Acquired SVA can result from previous cardiac surgery, endocarditis, syphilis, atherosclerosis, or chest injury [3]. SVA arises from the right sinus of Valsalva in 80-85% cases, from the non-coronary sinus in 5-15%, and rarely from the left sinus. Despite being generally asymptomatic, SVA can compress adjacent structures, resulting in acute

The aim. To determine the optimally necessary devices for endovascular stenting of coarctation of the aorta (CoA), considering the anatomical features of the defect and the age of the patient. Materials and methods. Examination and endovascular treatment of 189 patients aged 5 to 60 years with CoA of different anatomical and morphological variants was performed. Results and discussion. We presented the clinical features of different anatomical andmorphological variants of CoA. Endovascular treatment of CoA with stenting is considered the best method for adolescents and adults, due to the lower risk of aneurysm formation compared to balloon angioplasty. We were able to successfully reduce the invasive pressure gradient in patients of different ages and to establish dependence of the frequency of complications on the type of the stent used. There were no cases of in-hospital death. The effectiveness of the intervention was 99.4 %. All the patients were discharged from the hospital in good condition 3-7 days (3.3 ± 1.9 days) after the procedure. Currently, 95.7 % are being followed up. During the 5-year follow-up period, 1 patient died due to concomitant heart failure, heart rhythm disturbances (atrial fibrillation) and mitral insufficiency. There were 10.1 % patients (n = 19) with complications: 4.9 % (n = 4) with open-cell stents, 12.1 % (n = 13) with closed-cell stents, 2.2 % (n = 4) with stent-grafts, 7.9 % (n = 16) with uncovered stents. The frequency of reinterventions was 45.0 % in patients older than 25 years, 37.2 % in those aged 5-18 years and 17.6 % in those aged 19-25 years. Conclusions. The choice of optimally necessary devices for endovascular stenting of the aorta is recommended to be carried out considering the anatomical features of the defect and the age of the patient.

According to European guidelines, endovascular closure is the method of choice for defects with favorable anatomy. However, there are no clear criteria for determining favorable anatomy and this issue requires additional investigation. According to literature data, only 24.2% of secundum atrial septal defects (ASDII) have a central location, others have complicated anatomy. The aim. To analyze the experience of endovascular closure of ASDII with complex anatomy. Materials. In the period from 2003 to 2021, 1732 transesophageal echocardiographies and intracardiac echocardiographieswereperformedinpatientswithASDIIinitiallydiagnosedaccordingtotransthoracicechocardiography, and only 1408 (91.8%) were selected for endovascular closure. Mean age was 19.9±18 years, mean weight was 45±26.68 kg. Methods. The standard closure technique was primarily used in 100% of cases, and only when it was ineffective, we used modified techniques. Results. Modified techniques were used in 478 (33.9%) of 1408 patients and were effective in 460 (96.2%) patients with the complex anatomy. Based on previous statement, 460 (32.6%) of 1408 patients (one third of all) had modified techniques utilized and avoided open surgery. In 18 (1.3%) cases, it was impossible to close the defect. The overall technical success of transcatheter closure was 98.7% (1390 patients). Nineteen (1.3%) patients with poor visualization of inferior rim on transesophageal echocardiography had intracardiac echocardiography; in two of them inferior rim was present, others had open surgery. The rate of complications in immediate periprocedural period was 1.9% (27 patients). One death was recorded in the period of introduction of percutaneous interventions in our institution. Mean follow-up period was 5.41±3.28 years. In the follow-up period two complications were observed: 1 case of erosion, 17 (1.9%) cases of new-onset atrial fibrillation. Conclusion. The majority (90.6%) of ASDII can be closed percutaneously. Modified techniques improve the efficacy of the procedure enabling to close 32.6% of the defects. Safe procedure for the defects with complex anatomy is possible only with surgical and arrhythmological services back-up.

No abstract