Justice in the Russian Federation is carried out according to the rules established by the civil procedure code of the Russian Federation. As the primary and most important condition of justice and a guarantee of protection of the rights and interests of interested persons, by making a legal and justified decision, the need for the court to establish the actual circumstances of the case is highlighted. The means by which the court is able to reconstruct the picture of what happened include evidence, that is, the evidence of a crime. information obtained by legal means about the facts by which the court can determine the presence or absence of circumstances justifying the position of the parties, as well as other circumstances. Explanations of the parties and third parties are mandatory and primary evidence in civil proceedings. Whether the party’s position is true and justified, and how other means of proof, such as the results of a forensic examination, or testimony, relate to the party’s explanations, will determine the outcome of the dispute in court and, accordingly, the satisfaction or refusal to satisfy the claims. Abuse of the right to appeal to the court, as well as lying in court is an unacceptable, so one of the tasks of the court is to properly consider the case by establishing all the circumstances of the case, including the explanation of the parties and third parties, in order to protect the violated or disputed right.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The deviation of judicial protection from international standards cannot be explained by domestic objectives or by additional guarantees aimed at empowering some and infringing on others. This research is based on a concrete and abstract manifestation of the problem, which is the impossibility of restricting access to the information necessary to use established legal mechanisms and institutions that have been influenced by time. Equal access attributed by free legal aid and guaranteed by a set of legal institutions and agencies provides non-discrimination as the right an access to justice. Non-discrimination determines the obligation of the state to provide legal assistance to socially unprotected categories of citizens. The authors argue that the right to receive free legal aid in the protection of the violated subjective law should also be maintained in the socially significant categories of cases. In this regard, States are encouraged to organize legal aid programmes to allow legal entity access to the courts, even with global digitalization. The widespread digitalization of modern society has inevitably led to a violation of human rights. The lack of equal access to justice due to unrealized opportunities for remote interaction, the right to address government agencies and authorities actualize the global problem setting to be addressed by states through free legal aid programmes. The implementation of the programmes will be facilitated by measures aimed at making information available to obtain free legal aid and the entities providing it.