Surgical site infections are the most common in-hospital acquired infections. The aim of this study and the primary endpoint is to evaluate how the measures to reduce the SARS-CoV-2 spreading affected the superficial and deep SSI rate. A total of 541 patients were included.

The postponing of screening and the health care system reorganization, due to the Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown, could led to a concerning decline in breast and colorectal cancer diagnoses. This monocentric retrospective analysis has compared the pre-Covid period (March 2019 to March 2020) to the Covid period (April 2020 to April 2021) in terms of screening programs, clinical, surgical and pathological. A total of 799 patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer (BC) and Colorectal Cancer (CRC) underwent surgery during the two periods. In FVG in 2020 a decrease in mammography screening of 17.1% has been registered compared to 2019; this reduction has been higher for CRC screening, which summed up to 24.5%. As far as BC is concerned, screening-detected tumours rose significantly from 18 to 28%, mastectomies decreased from 40 to 31% and advanced tumours treated surgically decreased from 12 to 6%. Concerning CRC, a significant increase in admissions through the Emergency Department has been registered in spite of a stable percentage of urgent surgery performed, proving that severely symptomatic patients have been treated adequately. Open surgery has significantly decreased, whereas the tumoral stage and complications have remained constant in the two periods. This study has proved that maintaining standards of care and validated protocols during emergency is the most adequate and winning strategy: impact on BC and CRC has been less important than expected. These results support the recommendations for immediate and rapid screening program resumption at operating speed, using prioritization strategies to make up for the diagnostic delays.

Purpose On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 as a “public health emergency of international concern.” The primary aim of the study was to evaluate weight and food habit changes during COVID-19 outbreak. The secondary endpoint was to explore the psychological factors, arising during the pandemic, influencing weight and dietary variations. Materials and Methods A survey composed of four different items was conducted by telephone interview: (1) anthropometric data and type of procedure, (2) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), (3) maladaptive eating behaviors, and (4) personal feelings moved by the COVID-19 spread and lockdown. Results Fifty-six patients were enrolled. No significant changes in weight, BMI, and maladaptive eating habits were observed. A significant reduction in the anxiety index score was observed. In 17.8% of cases, a change in obesity class was reported, and among these patients, a substantial modification in bariatric procedures was planned (60%). Conclusion This study showed no effect on weight and BMI nor on rates of maladaptive eating habits associated with quarantine/social isolation among severely obese individuals waiting for the bariatric surgery. At the end of lockdown, a considerable proportion of patients modified their initial obesity class, and in selected cases, it could represent a criteria for rearrangement of the planned bariatric procedure. In obese patients, the lockdown and social distancing generated a reduction of fear of confronting and being negatively judged by others. This psychological aspect was assessed with the reduction of the HADS score.

The surgical treatment of the intermediate-risk DTC (1-4 cm) remains still controversial. We analyzed the current practice in Italy regarding the surgical management of intermediate-risk unilateral DTC to evaluate risk factors for recurrence and to identify a group of patients to whom propose a total thyroidectomy (TT) vs. hemithyroidectomy (HT). Among 1896 patients operated for thyroid cancer between January 2017 and December 2019, we evaluated 564 (29.7%) patients with unilateral intermediaterisk DTC (1-4 cm) without contralateral nodular lesions on the preoperative exams, chronic autoimmune thyroiditis, familiarity or radiance exposure. Data were collected retrospectively from the clinical register from 16 referral centers. The patients were followed for at least 14 months (median time 29.21 months). In our cohort 499 patients (88.4%) underwent total thyroidectomy whereas 65 patients (11.6%) underwent hemithyroidectomy. 151 (26.8%) patients had a multifocal DTC of whom 57 (10.1%) were bilateral. 21/66 (32.3%) patients were reoperated within 2 months from the first intervention (completion thyroidectomy). Three patients (3/564) developed regional lymph node recurrence 2 years after surgery and required a lymph nodal neck dissection. The single factor related to the risk of reoperation was the histological diameter (HR = 1.05 (1.00-1-09), p = 0.026). Risk stratification is the key to differentiating treatment options and achieving better outcomes. According to the present study, tumor diameter is a strong predictive risk factor to proper choose initial surgical management for intermediate-risk DTC.